Impact of carotid arterial pressure measurements for cerebrovascular impedance estimation

Cerebrovascular impedance quantifies the relationship between pulsatile changes in arterial pressure and cerebral artery blood flow velocity, reflecting the Windkessel effect in dampening blood flow oscillations. For its estimation, arterial pressure can be measured at either the common carotid artery (CCA) or the internal carotid artery (ICA) using applanation tonometry. However, due to pressure wave propagation and potential waveform distortions, even over short vascular distances, pressure waveforms recorded at the ICA may differ from those at the CCA. Therefore, this study investigated the impact of measurement site (CCA vs. ICA) on cerebrovascular impedance estimation. Sixteen healthy young adults (18-25 yr, 9 women) underwent simultaneous recordings of ipsilateral CCA and ICA pressure and CBF velocity in the middle cerebral artery using B-mode ultrasound and transcranial Doppler. The transfer function gain from CCA to ICA pressures remained close to 1.0 up to 2.34 Hz and then declined slightly and linearly, reaching approximately 0.6 at 7.80 Hz, whereas both phase and coherence remained stable up to approximately 7 Hz. Repeated measures correlation showed strong intraindividual agreement in cerebrovascular impedance estimates from both pressure sites, although ICA-derived values tended to be lower at higher frequencies. Importantly, no significant differences were observed below 6 Hz. Thus, the choice of carotid arterial pressure measurement site (CCA vs. ICA) has minimal impact on cerebrovascular impedance estimation within this lower frequency range.<b>NEW & NOTEWORTHY</b> This study found that cerebrovascular impedance estimates are minimally affected by whether pressure is measured at the common or internal carotid artery below 6 Hz, despite some attenuation of pressure waveforms at higher frequencies. Strong intraindividual agreement supports the use of either site for impedance estimation within the lower frequency range relevant to cerebral hemodynamics.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
American Journal of Physiology-Heart and Circulatory Physiology
Published
2025-09-12
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1152/ajpheart.00556.2025
Primary Topic
Cardiovascular Health and Disease Prevention
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Impact of carotid arterial pressure measurements for cerebrovascular impedance estimation

Marina Fukuie, Takashi Tarumi, Jun Sugawara, Tsubasa Tomoto et al.
American Journal of Physiology-Heart and Circulatory Physiology
Cardiovascular Health and Disease Prevention
article

Impact of carotid arterial pressure measurements for cerebrovascular impedance estimation

Marina Fukuie, Takashi Tarumi, Jun Sugawara, Tsubasa Tomoto, Rong Zhang
article en

Abstract

Cerebrovascular impedance quantifies the relationship between pulsatile changes in arterial pressure and cerebral artery blood flow velocity, reflecting the Windkessel effect in dampening blood flow oscillations. For its estimation, arterial pressure can be measured at either the common carotid artery (CCA) or the internal carotid artery (ICA) using applanation tonometry. However, due to pressure wave propagation and potential waveform distortions, even over short vascular distances, pressure waveforms recorded at the ICA may differ from those at the CCA. Therefore, this study investigated the impact of measurement site (CCA vs. ICA) on cerebrovascular impedance estimation. Sixteen healthy young adults (18-25 yr, 9 women) underwent simultaneous recordings of ipsilateral CCA and ICA pressure and CBF velocity in the middle cerebral artery using B-mode ultrasound and transcranial Doppler. The transfer function gain from CCA to ICA pressures remained close to 1.0 up to 2.34 Hz and then declined slightly and linearly, reaching approximately 0.6 at 7.80 Hz, whereas both phase and coherence remained stable up to approximately 7 Hz. Repeated measures correlation showed strong intraindividual agreement in cerebrovascular impedance estimates from both pressure sites, although ICA-derived values tended to be lower at higher frequencies. Importantly, no significant differences were observed below 6 Hz. Thus, the choice of carotid arterial pressure measurement site (CCA vs. ICA) has minimal impact on cerebrovascular impedance estimation within this lower frequency range.<b>NEW & NOTEWORTHY</b> This study found that cerebrovascular impedance estimates are minimally affected by whether pressure is measured at the common or internal carotid artery below 6 Hz, despite some attenuation of pressure waveforms at higher frequencies. Strong intraindividual agreement supports the use of either site for impedance estimation within the lower frequency range relevant to cerebral hemodynamics.

American Journal of Physiology-Heart and Circulatory PhysiologyVol. 329(5)
Texas Health Dallas (US), Presbyterian Hospital (US), Institute for Exercise and Environmental Medicine (US), Southwestern Medical Center (US), National Institute of Advanced Industrial Science and Technology (JP), The University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 62%
Cardiovascular Health and Disease Prevention
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.