Single-session radiofrequency ablation versus microwave ablation of predominantly solid benign thyroid nodules—a comparison after propensity score matching for initial nodule volumes and diameters

Question The comparative efficacy of single-session radiofrequency ablation (RFA) versus microwave ablation (MWA) for benign solid thyroid nodules remains unclear and so are factors affecting treatment efficacy. Findings Larger nodule diameter and volume negatively correlated with efficacy of RFA. For smaller nodules, RFA and MWA were comparable. MWA may have better efficacy for larger nodules. Clinical relevance For smaller nodules (max diameter < 3.5 cm or volume < 20 mL), RFA and MWA were equally effective and safe. For larger nodules (max diameter ≥ 3.5 cm or volume ≥ 20 mL), MWA may be more efficacious. Verification with prospective trials that account for baseline nodule volumes is needed.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
European Radiology
Published
2025-09-12
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00330-025-11985-4
Primary Topic
Thyroid Cancer Diagnosis and Treatment
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Single-session radiofrequency ablation versus microwave ablation of predominantly solid benign thyroid nodules—a comparison after propensity score matching for initial nodule volumes and diameters

Matrix Man Him Fung, Yan Luk, Brian Hung‐Hin Lang
European Radiology
Thyroid Cancer Diagnosis and Treatment
article

Single-session radiofrequency ablation versus microwave ablation of predominantly solid benign thyroid nodules—a comparison after propensity score matching for initial nodule volumes and diameters

Matrix Man Him Fung, Yan Luk, Brian Hung‐Hin Lang
article en

Abstract

Question The comparative efficacy of single-session radiofrequency ablation (RFA) versus microwave ablation (MWA) for benign solid thyroid nodules remains unclear and so are factors affecting treatment efficacy. Findings Larger nodule diameter and volume negatively correlated with efficacy of RFA. For smaller nodules, RFA and MWA were comparable. MWA may have better efficacy for larger nodules. Clinical relevance For smaller nodules (max diameter < 3.5 cm or volume < 20 mL), RFA and MWA were equally effective and safe. For larger nodules (max diameter ≥ 3.5 cm or volume ≥ 20 mL), MWA may be more efficacious. Verification with prospective trials that account for baseline nodule volumes is needed.

European RadiologyVol. 36(3)
Queen Mary Hospital (CN), University of Hong Kong (HK)
Openalex Percentile: Top 67%
Thyroid Cancer Diagnosis and Treatment
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.