Loop Diuretic Dose Intensification versus Adjuvant Thiazide for Diuretic Resistance in Acute Heart Failure

Key Points Adjuvant thiazide improved diuretic response more than loop dose increase in patients with acute heart failure and diuretic resistance. The underlying diuretic resistance mechanism did not identify preferential response to either diuretic escalation strategy. Background The optimal therapy for loop diuretic resistance may differ if caused by resistance at the site of action in the loop of Henle (diuretic resistance at the loop of Henle [DR-Loop]) versus compensatory distal reabsorption (diuretic resistance due to distal sodium reabsorption [DR-Distal]). This study primarily aimed to compare diuretic strategies and explore whether targeting the underlying diuretic resistance mechanism could optimize diuretic response. Methods Patients hospitalized with heart failure and diuretic resistance (6-hour cumulative natriuresis <100 mmol after intravenous [IV] loop diuretic) were randomized 1:1 to ( 1 ) 2.5× IV loop dose intensification or ( 2 ) IV chlorothiazide addition to the same loop diuretic. The primary trial outcome was the increase in 6-hour natriuresis between strategies. Exploratory analyses of diuretic resistance mechanism were performed. Diuretic resistance mechanisms were categorized using the fractional excretion of lithium (FE Li ), a metric evaluating sodium exit from the loop of Henle. DR-Loop was defined as a loop diuretic–induced increase in FE Li below the median and DR-Distal as an increase in FE Li above the median at the screening visit. Results Patients (mean age 68±12 years, 40% women) were randomized to loop dose intensification ( n =51) or adjuvant thiazide ( n =52). The primary outcome of increase in 6-hour natriuresis improved significantly with both strategies. However, chlorothiazide addition produced a significantly larger improvement in 6-hour natriuresis (107 mmol increase [95% confidence interval (CI), 81 to 132]) compared with loop augmentation (49 mmol increase [95% CI, 31 to 66]; treatment effect 58 mmol [95% CI, 27 to 89]; P < 0.001). Paradoxically, loop intensification augmented natriuresis less in patients with DR-Loop compared with DR-Distal (27±39 versus 75±77 mmol, respectively, P = 0.004), and adjuvant thiazide did not increase natriuresis more in patients with DR-Distal versus DR-Loop (92±71 versus 105±86 mmol, respectively, P = 0.54). Conclusions Strategies of loop dose intensification and adjuvant thiazide both improved diuretic response, with a significantly larger augmentation of natriuresis with adjuvant thiazide. The underlying diuretic resistance mechanism did not identify a preferential response to either therapy. Clinical Trial registry name and registration number: ClinicalTrials.gov, Diagnosing and Targeting Mechanisms of Diuretic Resistance in Heart Failure NCT02546583.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of the American Society of Nephrology
Published
2025-09-12
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1681/asn.0000000887
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Heart Failure Treatment and Management
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.39
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Loop Diuretic Dose Intensification versus Adjuvant Thiazide for Diuretic Resistance in Acute Heart Failure

F. Perry Wilson, Christopher Maulion, Lavanya Bellumkonda, Jeffrey M. Turner et al.
1 citations
Journal of the American Society of Nephrology
Heart Failure Treatment and Management
1.39
article

Loop Diuretic Dose Intensification versus Adjuvant Thiazide for Diuretic Resistance in Acute Heart Failure

F. Perry Wilson, Christopher Maulion, Lavanya Bellumkonda, Jeffrey M. Turner, Michelle M. Estrella, David H. Ellison, Biff Forbush, Zachary L. Cox, Paul A. Welling, Daniela Ramos‐Mastache, Juan Betuel Ivey-Miranda, Julieta Moreno-Villagómez, Michael G. Shilpak, Christopher S. Wilcox, Veena S. Rao, Jeffrey M. Testani
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Key Points Adjuvant thiazide improved diuretic response more than loop dose increase in patients with acute heart failure and diuretic resistance. The underlying diuretic resistance mechanism did not identify preferential response to either diuretic escalation strategy. Background The optimal therapy for loop diuretic resistance may differ if caused by resistance at the site of action in the loop of Henle (diuretic resistance at the loop of Henle [DR-Loop]) versus compensatory distal reabsorption (diuretic resistance due to distal sodium reabsorption [DR-Distal]). This study primarily aimed to compare diuretic strategies and explore whether targeting the underlying diuretic resistance mechanism could optimize diuretic response. Methods Patients hospitalized with heart failure and diuretic resistance (6-hour cumulative natriuresis <100 mmol after intravenous [IV] loop diuretic) were randomized 1:1 to ( 1 ) 2.5× IV loop dose intensification or ( 2 ) IV chlorothiazide addition to the same loop diuretic. The primary trial outcome was the increase in 6-hour natriuresis between strategies. Exploratory analyses of diuretic resistance mechanism were performed. Diuretic resistance mechanisms were categorized using the fractional excretion of lithium (FE Li ), a metric evaluating sodium exit from the loop of Henle. DR-Loop was defined as a loop diuretic–induced increase in FE Li below the median and DR-Distal as an increase in FE Li above the median at the screening visit. Results Patients (mean age 68±12 years, 40% women) were randomized to loop dose intensification ( n =51) or adjuvant thiazide ( n =52). The primary outcome of increase in 6-hour natriuresis improved significantly with both strategies. However, chlorothiazide addition produced a significantly larger improvement in 6-hour natriuresis (107 mmol increase [95% confidence interval (CI), 81 to 132]) compared with loop augmentation (49 mmol increase [95% CI, 31 to 66]; treatment effect 58 mmol [95% CI, 27 to 89]; P < 0.001). Paradoxically, loop intensification augmented natriuresis less in patients with DR-Loop compared with DR-Distal (27±39 versus 75±77 mmol, respectively, P = 0.004), and adjuvant thiazide did not increase natriuresis more in patients with DR-Distal versus DR-Loop (92±71 versus 105±86 mmol, respectively, P = 0.54). Conclusions Strategies of loop dose intensification and adjuvant thiazide both improved diuretic response, with a significantly larger augmentation of natriuresis with adjuvant thiazide. The underlying diuretic resistance mechanism did not identify a preferential response to either therapy. Clinical Trial registry name and registration number: ClinicalTrials.gov, Diagnosing and Targeting Mechanisms of Diuretic Resistance in Heart Failure NCT02546583.

Journal of the American Society of NephrologyVol. 37(3)
Johns Hopkins University (US), Mexican Social Security Institute (MX), Oregon Health & Science University (US), University of California, San Francisco (US), Georgetown University (US), Lipscomb University (US), Vanderbilt University (US), Johns Hopkins Medicine (US), Yale University (US), Oregon Clinic (US), University of San Francisco (US), Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México (MX)
Openalex Percentile: Top 15%
Heart Failure Treatment and Management
1.39
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.