Studying Time-Resolved Functional Connectivity via Communication Theory: On the Complementary Nature of Phase Synchronization and Sliding Window Pearson Correlation

<b><i>Background:</i></b> Time-resolved functional network connectivity (trFNC) assesses the time-resolved coupling between brain regions using functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) data. This study aims to compare two techniques used to estimate trFNC, to investigate their similarities and differences when applied to fMRI data. These techniques are the sliding window Pearson correlation (SWPC), an amplitude-based approach, and phase synchrony (PS), a phase-based technique. <b><i>Methods:</i></b> To accomplish our objective, we used resting-state fMRI data from the Human Connectome Project with 827 subjects [repetition time (TR): 0.7 sec] and the Function Biomedical Informatics Research Network with 311 subjects (TR: 2 sec), which included 151 schizophrenia (SZ) patients and 160 controls. <b><i>Results:</i></b> Our simulations reveal distinct strengths in two connectivity methods: SWPC captures high-magnitude, low-frequency connectivity, whereas PS detects low-magnitude, high-frequency connectivity. Stronger correlations between SWPC and PS align with pronounced fMRI oscillations. For fMRI data, higher correlations between SWPC and PS occur with matched frequencies and smaller SWPC window sizes (∼30 sec), but larger windows (∼88 sec) sacrifice clinically relevant information. Both methods identify a SZ-associated brain network state but show different patterns: SWPC highlights low anticorrelations between visual, subcortical, auditory, and sensory-motor networks, whereas PS shows reduced positive synchronization among these networks. <b><i>Conclusion:</i></b> In sum, our findings underscore the complementary nature of SWPC and PS, elucidating their respective strengths and limitations without implying the superiority of one over the other.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Brain Connectivity
Published
2025-09-12
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/21580014251376733
Citations
2
Primary Topic
Functional Brain Connectivity Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
2.86
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Studying Time-Resolved Functional Connectivity via Communication Theory: On the Complementary Nature of Phase Synchronization and Sliding Window Pearson Correlation

Vince D. Calhoun, Ashkan Faghiri, Sir-Lord Wiafe, Nana O. Asante
2 citations
Brain Connectivity
Functional Brain Connectivity Studies
2.86
article

Studying Time-Resolved Functional Connectivity via Communication Theory: On the Complementary Nature of Phase Synchronization and Sliding Window Pearson Correlation

Vince D. Calhoun, Ashkan Faghiri, Sir-Lord Wiafe, Nana O. Asante
article en
2 citations

Abstract

<b><i>Background:</i></b> Time-resolved functional network connectivity (trFNC) assesses the time-resolved coupling between brain regions using functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) data. This study aims to compare two techniques used to estimate trFNC, to investigate their similarities and differences when applied to fMRI data. These techniques are the sliding window Pearson correlation (SWPC), an amplitude-based approach, and phase synchrony (PS), a phase-based technique. <b><i>Methods:</i></b> To accomplish our objective, we used resting-state fMRI data from the Human Connectome Project with 827 subjects [repetition time (TR): 0.7 sec] and the Function Biomedical Informatics Research Network with 311 subjects (TR: 2 sec), which included 151 schizophrenia (SZ) patients and 160 controls. <b><i>Results:</i></b> Our simulations reveal distinct strengths in two connectivity methods: SWPC captures high-magnitude, low-frequency connectivity, whereas PS detects low-magnitude, high-frequency connectivity. Stronger correlations between SWPC and PS align with pronounced fMRI oscillations. For fMRI data, higher correlations between SWPC and PS occur with matched frequencies and smaller SWPC window sizes (∼30 sec), but larger windows (∼88 sec) sacrifice clinically relevant information. Both methods identify a SZ-associated brain network state but show different patterns: SWPC highlights low anticorrelations between visual, subcortical, auditory, and sensory-motor networks, whereas PS shows reduced positive synchronization among these networks. <b><i>Conclusion:</i></b> In sum, our findings underscore the complementary nature of SWPC and PS, elucidating their respective strengths and limitations without implying the superiority of one over the other.

Brain ConnectivityVol. 15(8)
Georgia Institute of Technology (US), Emory University (US), Georgia State University (US), ETH Zurich (CH), Ashesi University (GH), Center for Translational Research in Neuroimaging and Data Science (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 8%
Functional Brain Connectivity Studies
2.86
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.