Life cycle carbon assessment of reinforced concrete, structural steel, and mass-timber buildings in Canada

Urban population growth drives demand for buildings, increasing carbon emissions. In recent years, the Canadian government has been encouraging renewable construction materials. However, comparative assessments of embodied carbon emissions of various building types across Canada are limited. This study addresses this gap by conducting a life-cycle carbon assessment of functionally equivalent three- and six-storey commercial office reinforced concrete (RC), structural steel (SS), and mass-timber (MT) buildings in Vancouver, Montreal, and Toronto, Canada, using Athena impact estimator for buildings. Excluding biogenic carbon, MT reduces global warming potential (GWP) by 33%–36% and 27%–32% for three- and six-storey buildings compared to RC in phases A–C, and by 14%–19% and 5%–14% compared to SS, respectively. Including phase D and biogenic carbon, MT reduces GWP by 99%–102% and 109%–118% for the three- and six-storey buildings compared to RC, and by 99%–105% and 118%–139% compared to SS, respectively.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Canadian Journal of Civil Engineering
Published
2025-09-09
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1139/cjce-2025-0107
Primary Topic
Environmental Impact and Sustainability
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Life cycle carbon assessment of reinforced concrete, structural steel, and mass-timber buildings in Canada

Haibo Feng, Alexander Salenikovich, Matiyas A. Bezabeh, Colin A. Rogers et al.
Canadian Journal of Civil Engineering
Environmental Impact and Sustainability
article

Life cycle carbon assessment of reinforced concrete, structural steel, and mass-timber buildings in Canada

Haibo Feng, Alexander Salenikovich, Matiyas A. Bezabeh, Colin A. Rogers, Aya Risha
article en

Abstract

Urban population growth drives demand for buildings, increasing carbon emissions. In recent years, the Canadian government has been encouraging renewable construction materials. However, comparative assessments of embodied carbon emissions of various building types across Canada are limited. This study addresses this gap by conducting a life-cycle carbon assessment of functionally equivalent three- and six-storey commercial office reinforced concrete (RC), structural steel (SS), and mass-timber (MT) buildings in Vancouver, Montreal, and Toronto, Canada, using Athena impact estimator for buildings. Excluding biogenic carbon, MT reduces global warming potential (GWP) by 33%–36% and 27%–32% for three- and six-storey buildings compared to RC in phases A–C, and by 14%–19% and 5%–14% compared to SS, respectively. Including phase D and biogenic carbon, MT reduces GWP by 99%–102% and 109%–118% for the three- and six-storey buildings compared to RC, and by 99%–105% and 118%–139% compared to SS, respectively.

Canadian Journal of Civil EngineeringVol. 52(12)
University of British Columbia (CA), Université Laval (CA), McGill University (CA)
Openalex Percentile: Top 78%
Environmental Impact and Sustainability
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.