Avoiding a repetition of past mistakes: Response to Gozlan’s critique of “Do we want to know?”

D'Angelo, the author of "Do We Want To Know" responds to Gozlan's critique of his paper. He argues that Gozlan recruits psychoanalytic elitism to discredit his work, rather than engaging with the paper's central concerns. The first issue that Gozlan avoids addressing is the misuse of academic writing to discredit those with whom we disagree, extensively documented in "Do We Want To Know". The second is the refusal to acknowledge the weak evidence base for gender-affirming interventions for youth increasingly embraced by the prevailing psychoanalytic zeitgeist. D'Angelo suggests that this is a repetition of psychoanalysis' rejection of empirical science, which in the past has led to patient harm and which has contributed to the increasing marginalisation of our profession.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
The International Journal of Psychoanalysis
Published
2025-07-04
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1080/00207578.2025.2507488
Primary Topic
Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Avoiding a repetition of past mistakes: Response to Gozlan’s critique of “Do we want to know?”

Roberto D’Angelo
The International Journal of Psychoanalysis
Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics
article

Avoiding a repetition of past mistakes: Response to Gozlan’s critique of “Do we want to know?”

Roberto D’Angelo
article en

Abstract

D'Angelo, the author of "Do We Want To Know" responds to Gozlan's critique of his paper. He argues that Gozlan recruits psychoanalytic elitism to discredit his work, rather than engaging with the paper's central concerns. The first issue that Gozlan avoids addressing is the misuse of academic writing to discredit those with whom we disagree, extensively documented in "Do We Want To Know". The second is the refusal to acknowledge the weak evidence base for gender-affirming interventions for youth increasingly embraced by the prevailing psychoanalytic zeitgeist. D'Angelo suggests that this is a repetition of psychoanalysis' rejection of empirical science, which in the past has led to patient harm and which has contributed to the increasing marginalisation of our profession.

The International Journal of PsychoanalysisVol. 106(4)
Institute of Contemporary Psychoanalysis (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 76%
Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.