Combined oropharyngeal nasal (ON) swabs for the molecular detection of respiratory pathogens including <i>M. pneumoniae</i> in symptomatic children

This study aimed to evaluate the diagnostic yield and acceptability of parent-/caregiver-collected oropharyngeal nasal (ON) swabs compared with healthcare worker (HCW)-collected nasopharyngeal (NP) swabs for detecting respiratory viruses and <i>Mycoplasma pneumoniae</i> in children. Symptomatic children (0-4 years) presenting to the BC Children's Hospital Emergency Department provided HCW-collected NP and caregiver-collected ON swabs. Acceptability was assessed using a 5-point Likert scale. Samples were tested using the SARS-CoV-2/Influenza A + B/RSV GeneXpert assay, and a subset was tested on the BioFire respiratory panel (RP) 2.1 during the initial research phase. In a subsequent implementation phase during a high incidence of <i>M. pneumoniae</i>, paired ON and NP swabs were collected and tested on the RP 2.1 in a quality improvement initiative. All <i>M. pneumoniae</i>-positive samples underwent testing for cycle threshold values. We analyzed 139 pairs from the research phase and 219 from the implementation phase. Detection rates for SARS-CoV-2, influenza A/B, and RSV were similar across swab types. Of 273 pairs tested on BioFire, ON swabs demonstrated significantly higher detection of <i>M. pneumoniae</i> (sensitivity of 94%, confidence interval [CI] [86, 98] ON vs 64% [61-75] NP, <i>P</i> = 0.0020) and comparable detection for other pathogens. Caregivers rated ON swab collection as more acceptable than NP swabs (median 4.5 [4-5] vs 2 [IQR 1-3], <i>P</i> < 0.0001). ON swab performance was similar to NP swabs for the detection of respiratory viruses and showed improved diagnostic yield of <i>M. pneumoniae</i>. Given their higher acceptability ratings, ON swabs should be considered as a less-invasive diagnostic option for children.IMPORTANCEThe current clinical standard for diagnosing respiratory infections in children typically requires a nasopharyngeal (NP) swab, which may be uncomfortable for the patient and must be collected by a healthcare worker. This study presents a less-invasive option, an oropharyngeal nasal (ON) swab collected by a parent or caregiver, that has comparable detection for common respiratory viruses and improved detection for <i>Mycoplasma pneumoniae</i>, a common but treatable cause of childhood pneumonia. Additionally, parents/caregivers rated ON swabs as significantly more acceptable than NP swabs on a scale of 1 to 5. Given the increased acceptability and superior detection of treatable <i>M. pneumoniae</i>, ON swabs are a patient-centered alternative to NP swabs and should be considered as a preferred diagnostic option for children.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Microbiology Spectrum
Published
2025-09-12
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1128/spectrum.02181-25
Primary Topic
Respiratory viral infections research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Combined oropharyngeal nasal (ON) swabs for the molecular detection of respiratory pathogens including M. pneumoniae in symptomatic children

Jonathan B. Gubbay, Linda Hoang, Hannah Nelson, David A. Goldfarb et al.
Microbiology Spectrum
Respiratory viral infections research
article

Combined oropharyngeal nasal (ON) swabs for the molecular detection of respiratory pathogens including M. pneumoniae in symptomatic children

Jonathan B. Gubbay, Linda Hoang, Hannah Nelson, David A. Goldfarb, Jocelyn A. Srigley, Iryna Kayda, Garth Meckler, Michael Hawkes, Mai‐Lei Woo Kinshella, Jennifer Cochrane, Vikram Sabhaney, Neil Bipinchandra Desai, Miguel Imperial, Michelle Dittrick, Lynne Li, Nicole Watson
article en

Abstract

This study aimed to evaluate the diagnostic yield and acceptability of parent-/caregiver-collected oropharyngeal nasal (ON) swabs compared with healthcare worker (HCW)-collected nasopharyngeal (NP) swabs for detecting respiratory viruses and <i>Mycoplasma pneumoniae</i> in children. Symptomatic children (0-4 years) presenting to the BC Children's Hospital Emergency Department provided HCW-collected NP and caregiver-collected ON swabs. Acceptability was assessed using a 5-point Likert scale. Samples were tested using the SARS-CoV-2/Influenza A + B/RSV GeneXpert assay, and a subset was tested on the BioFire respiratory panel (RP) 2.1 during the initial research phase. In a subsequent implementation phase during a high incidence of <i>M. pneumoniae</i>, paired ON and NP swabs were collected and tested on the RP 2.1 in a quality improvement initiative. All <i>M. pneumoniae</i>-positive samples underwent testing for cycle threshold values. We analyzed 139 pairs from the research phase and 219 from the implementation phase. Detection rates for SARS-CoV-2, influenza A/B, and RSV were similar across swab types. Of 273 pairs tested on BioFire, ON swabs demonstrated significantly higher detection of <i>M. pneumoniae</i> (sensitivity of 94%, confidence interval [CI] [86, 98] ON vs 64% [61-75] NP, <i>P</i> = 0.0020) and comparable detection for other pathogens. Caregivers rated ON swab collection as more acceptable than NP swabs (median 4.5 [4-5] vs 2 [IQR 1-3], <i>P</i> < 0.0001). ON swab performance was similar to NP swabs for the detection of respiratory viruses and showed improved diagnostic yield of <i>M. pneumoniae</i>. Given their higher acceptability ratings, ON swabs should be considered as a less-invasive diagnostic option for children.IMPORTANCEThe current clinical standard for diagnosing respiratory infections in children typically requires a nasopharyngeal (NP) swab, which may be uncomfortable for the patient and must be collected by a healthcare worker. This study presents a less-invasive option, an oropharyngeal nasal (ON) swab collected by a parent or caregiver, that has comparable detection for common respiratory viruses and improved detection for <i>Mycoplasma pneumoniae</i>, a common but treatable cause of childhood pneumonia. Additionally, parents/caregivers rated ON swabs as significantly more acceptable than NP swabs on a scale of 1 to 5. Given the increased acceptability and superior detection of treatable <i>M. pneumoniae</i>, ON swabs are a patient-centered alternative to NP swabs and should be considered as a preferred diagnostic option for children.

Microbiology SpectrumVol. 13(10)
University of British Columbia (CA), BC Centre for Disease Control (CA), Community Connections (US), Community Based Research Centre (CA), Children's & Women's Health Centre of British Columbia (CA), BC Children's Hospital (CA), B.C. Women's Hospital & Health Centre (CA)
Openalex Percentile: Top 67%
Respiratory viral infections research
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.