The pitfalls of r<scp>DNA</scp>‐based <scp>AMF</scp> identification: a comparative analysis of r<scp>DNA</scp> and protein‐coding genes

Intragenomic polymorphism of rDNA in arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi (AMF) has been largely overlooked in ecological and taxonomic studies, and the reliability of nuclear rDNA regions for species identification has not been comprehensively evaluated and compared with protein-coding genes. Analysis of rDNA copies from Rhizophagus irregularis strains revealed average intragenomic distances ranging from 0.08% (small subunit) to 6.9% (internal transcribed spacer 2 (ITS2)), with a maximum of 21.1% in ITS1 within strain DAOM 197198. Intragenomic rDNA polymorphisms are widespread throughout the AM fungal phylogeny, as confirmed by single nucleotide polymorphism density analysis and PacBio sequencing of 148 AM fungal cultures representing 44 species. All commonly targeted rDNA loci in ecological and taxonomic studies are polymorphic, with ITS and large subunit being the most variable, leading to paraphyletic clades and misleading phylogenetic interpretations among closely related species. No unique genetic distance threshold can be applied to identify AMF, because none of the examined protein-coding genes or partial rDNA had a barcode gap. However, indicative distance thresholds of 1% for glomalin, 1.1% for RPB1, and 1.7% for H<sup>+</sup>-ATPase provide guidance for species delimitation. This study characterizes the extent of intragenomic rDNA polymorphism in AMF, underscores the taxonomic challenges posed by highly variable loci, and describes a bioinformatics pipeline for recovering rDNA copies.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
New Phytologist
Published
2025-09-12
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1111/nph.70557
Citations
4
Primary Topic
Genomics and Phylogenetic Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
3.22
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The pitfalls of rDNA‐based AMF identification: a comparative analysis of rDNA and protein‐coding genes

Kasia Dadej, Lobna Abdellatif, Mario Laterrière, Franck Stefani et al.
4 citations
New Phytologist
Genomics and Phylogenetic Studies
3.22
article

The pitfalls of rDNA‐based AMF identification: a comparative analysis of rDNA and protein‐coding genes

Kasia Dadej, Lobna Abdellatif, Mario Laterrière, Franck Stefani, Yolande Dalpé, Wendy A. Findlay, Lisa Koziol, Claudia Banchini, Sylvie Séguin, Gwynneth Stevens
article en
4 citations

Abstract

Intragenomic polymorphism of rDNA in arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi (AMF) has been largely overlooked in ecological and taxonomic studies, and the reliability of nuclear rDNA regions for species identification has not been comprehensively evaluated and compared with protein-coding genes. Analysis of rDNA copies from Rhizophagus irregularis strains revealed average intragenomic distances ranging from 0.08% (small subunit) to 6.9% (internal transcribed spacer 2 (ITS2)), with a maximum of 21.1% in ITS1 within strain DAOM 197198. Intragenomic rDNA polymorphisms are widespread throughout the AM fungal phylogeny, as confirmed by single nucleotide polymorphism density analysis and PacBio sequencing of 148 AM fungal cultures representing 44 species. All commonly targeted rDNA loci in ecological and taxonomic studies are polymorphic, with ITS and large subunit being the most variable, leading to paraphyletic clades and misleading phylogenetic interpretations among closely related species. No unique genetic distance threshold can be applied to identify AMF, because none of the examined protein-coding genes or partial rDNA had a barcode gap. However, indicative distance thresholds of 1% for glomalin, 1.1% for RPB1, and 1.7% for H<sup>+</sup>-ATPase provide guidance for species delimitation. This study characterizes the extent of intragenomic rDNA polymorphism in AMF, underscores the taxonomic challenges posed by highly variable loci, and describes a bioinformatics pipeline for recovering rDNA copies.

New PhytologistVol. 248(3)
Agriculture and Agri-Food Canada (CA), Ottawa Research and Development Centre
Openalex Percentile: Top 8%
Genomics and Phylogenetic Studies
3.22
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.