Relative safety of glyphosate-resistant maize (CC-2) in rats

With the rapid adoption of glyphosate-resistant (GR) crops by farmers, the food safety has garnered significant attention. This study aims to evaluate the relative safety of glyphosate-resistant maize (CC-2). Rats were divided into three groups: one group receiving AIN-93 G feed (AIN), one receiving non-modified receptor maize feed (NM), and the other receiving CC-2 maize feed (GM). The intervention spanned from gestation d 0 of the parental rats to 90 d post-weaning of the offspring. The results indicated no significant differences in pregnancy outcomes, body weight, growth monitoring, behavioral tests, or organ indexes between the GM group and the two control groups (AIN and NM). Although there were significant differences in some hematological parameters, serum chemistry, and organ weights, histopathological analysis revealed no abnormalities. No exogenous gene fragments were detected in major organs. In conclusion, CC-2 maize is relative safe for growth and development in rats.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
GM crops & food
Published
2025-09-12
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1080/21645698.2025.2550820
Primary Topic
Weed Control and Herbicide Applications
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Relative safety of glyphosate-resistant maize (CC-2) in rats

Xueqian Yin, Chao Hou, Ning Yin, Yuanzhi Jian et al.
GM crops & food
Weed Control and Herbicide Applications
article

Relative safety of glyphosate-resistant maize (CC-2) in rats

Xueqian Yin, Chao Hou, Ning Yin, Yuanzhi Jian, Junbo Wang, Shan Liu, Xiaoxuan Zhang, Xinran Liu, Jing Wen, Anyi Liu, Ruoyu Zhou
article en

Abstract

With the rapid adoption of glyphosate-resistant (GR) crops by farmers, the food safety has garnered significant attention. This study aims to evaluate the relative safety of glyphosate-resistant maize (CC-2). Rats were divided into three groups: one group receiving AIN-93 G feed (AIN), one receiving non-modified receptor maize feed (NM), and the other receiving CC-2 maize feed (GM). The intervention spanned from gestation d 0 of the parental rats to 90 d post-weaning of the offspring. The results indicated no significant differences in pregnancy outcomes, body weight, growth monitoring, behavioral tests, or organ indexes between the GM group and the two control groups (AIN and NM). Although there were significant differences in some hematological parameters, serum chemistry, and organ weights, histopathological analysis revealed no abnormalities. No exogenous gene fragments were detected in major organs. In conclusion, CC-2 maize is relative safe for growth and development in rats.

GM crops & foodVol. 16(1)
Peking University (CN), China National Center for Food Safety Risk Assessment (CN)
Openalex Percentile: Top 82%
Weed Control and Herbicide Applications
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Relative safety of glyphosate-resistant maize (CC-2) in rats — Xueqian Yin, Chao Hou, et al. · GM crops & food (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS