Quantifying Running Economy in Amateur Runners: Evaluating VO and Energy Cost with Model-based Normalization

Submaximal oxygen uptake (VO<sub>2sub</sub>) scaled by ratio is commonly used to evaluate running economy (RE) to reflect metabolic consumption at a given submaximal-intensity velocity. However, this method is questionable due to its neglect of substrate-related issues and the inherent mathematical discrepancies in ratio scaling. This study aimed to investigate the validity of ratio-scaled VO<sub>2sub</sub> as a measure of RE by comparing it with allometric-scaled energy cost (E<sub>c</sub>, kcal/kg<sup>b</sup>/min). Sixty-nine recreationally active college students underwent VO<sub>2max</sub> tests and discontinuous submaximal running assessments at three %VO<sub>2max</sub> intensities. A 1000-meter test assessed running performance. One-way repeated-measures ANOVA compared changes in VO<sub>2sub</sub> or E<sub>c</sub> with increasing running intensities. Regression analysis explored methods for metabolic data standardization. Pearson correlation coefficient evaluated the effectiveness of standardization and the correlations between sports performance and RE scaled by different measures. Magnitude-based inferences were used to assess sex differences and probabilities of RE at each running intensity. Both VO<sub>2sub</sub> and E<sub>c</sub> significantly increased with increasing intensities, suggesting that VO<sub>2sub</sub> is a valid quantification of RE. Allometric scaling is more suitable than ratio scaling for removing the influence of body weight on both E<sub>c</sub> and VO<sub>2sub</sub>, with females showing better RE. Allometric-scaled E<sub>c</sub> was sensitive in detecting correlations with performance, strongest at 65% VO<sub>2max</sub>. While VO<sub>2sub</sub> is a valid quantification of RE, allometric scaling, rather than ratio scaling, should be used to normalize the RE quantification before performing reliable interindividual comparisons. The 2/3 law can be considered as the exponent b value for body weight. Additionally, 65%VO<sub>2max</sub> intensity is recommended as the submaximal testing intensity in the RE test. Nonetheless, more studies with diverse samples are needed to confirm the validity.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Sports Science and Medicine
Published
2025-08-17
DOI
https://doi.org/10.52082/jssm.2025.684
Primary Topic
Sports Performance and Training
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Quantifying Running Economy in Amateur Runners: Evaluating VO and Energy Cost with Model-based Normalization

Jay Lee, Zhaowei Kong, Xiuli Zhang
Journal of Sports Science and Medicine
Sports Performance and Training
article

Quantifying Running Economy in Amateur Runners: Evaluating VO and Energy Cost with Model-based Normalization

Jay Lee, Zhaowei Kong, Xiuli Zhang
article en

Abstract

Submaximal oxygen uptake (VO<sub>2sub</sub>) scaled by ratio is commonly used to evaluate running economy (RE) to reflect metabolic consumption at a given submaximal-intensity velocity. However, this method is questionable due to its neglect of substrate-related issues and the inherent mathematical discrepancies in ratio scaling. This study aimed to investigate the validity of ratio-scaled VO<sub>2sub</sub> as a measure of RE by comparing it with allometric-scaled energy cost (E<sub>c</sub>, kcal/kg<sup>b</sup>/min). Sixty-nine recreationally active college students underwent VO<sub>2max</sub> tests and discontinuous submaximal running assessments at three %VO<sub>2max</sub> intensities. A 1000-meter test assessed running performance. One-way repeated-measures ANOVA compared changes in VO<sub>2sub</sub> or E<sub>c</sub> with increasing running intensities. Regression analysis explored methods for metabolic data standardization. Pearson correlation coefficient evaluated the effectiveness of standardization and the correlations between sports performance and RE scaled by different measures. Magnitude-based inferences were used to assess sex differences and probabilities of RE at each running intensity. Both VO<sub>2sub</sub> and E<sub>c</sub> significantly increased with increasing intensities, suggesting that VO<sub>2sub</sub> is a valid quantification of RE. Allometric scaling is more suitable than ratio scaling for removing the influence of body weight on both E<sub>c</sub> and VO<sub>2sub</sub>, with females showing better RE. Allometric-scaled E<sub>c</sub> was sensitive in detecting correlations with performance, strongest at 65% VO<sub>2max</sub>. While VO<sub>2sub</sub> is a valid quantification of RE, allometric scaling, rather than ratio scaling, should be used to normalize the RE quantification before performing reliable interindividual comparisons. The 2/3 law can be considered as the exponent b value for body weight. Additionally, 65%VO<sub>2max</sub> intensity is recommended as the submaximal testing intensity in the RE test. Nonetheless, more studies with diverse samples are needed to confirm the validity.

Journal of Sports Science and MedicineVol. 24(3)
South China Normal University (CN), University of Macau (MO)
Openalex Percentile: Top 69%
Sports Performance and Training
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.