On the Numerical Evaluation of Wall Shear Stress Using the Finite Element Method

Wall shear stress (WSS) is a crucial hemodynamic quantity extensively studied in cardiovascular research, yet its numerical computation is not straightforward. This work compares WSS results obtained from two different finite element discretizations, quantifies the differences between continuous and discontinuous stresses, and introduces a modified variationally consistent method for WSS evaluation through the formulation of a boundary-flux problem. Two benchmark problems are considered: a 2D Stokes flow on a unit square and a 3D Poiseuille flow through a cylindrical pipe. These are followed by investigations of steady-state Navier-Stokes flow in two image-based, patient-specific aneurysms. The study focuses on P1/P1 stabilized and Taylor-Hood P2/P1 mixed finite elements for velocity and pressure. WSS is computed using either the proposed boundary-flux method or as a projection of tangential traction onto first order Lagrange (P1), discontinuous Galerkin first order (DG-1), or discontinuous Galerkin zero order (DG-0) space. For the P1/P1 stabilized element, the boundary-flux and P1 projection methods yielded equivalent results. With the P2/P1 element, the boundary-flux evaluation demonstrated faster convergence in the Poiseuille flow example but showed increased sensitivity to pressure field inaccuracies in image-based geometries compared to the projection method. Furthermore, a paradoxical degradation in WSS accuracy was observed when combining the P2/P1 element with fine boundary-layer meshes on a cylindrical geometry, an effect attributed to inherent geometric approximation errors. In aneurysm geometries, the P2/P1 element exhibited superior robustness to mesh size when evaluating average WSS and low shear area (LSA), outperforming the P1/P1 stabilized element. Projecting discontinuous finite element functions into continuous spaces can introduce artifacts, such as the Gibbs phenomenon. Consequently, it is crucial to carefully select the finite element space for boundary stress calculations, not only in applications involving WSS computations for aneurysms.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
International Journal for Numerical Methods in Biomedical Engineering
Published
2025-09-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/cnm.70086
Primary Topic
Structural Analysis of Composite Materials
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

On the Numerical Evaluation of Wall Shear Stress Using the Finite Element Method

Kristian Valen‐Sendstad, J. Hron, Jørgen S. Dokken, Jana Brunátová
International Journal for Numerical Methods in Biomedical Engineering
Structural Analysis of Composite Materials
article

On the Numerical Evaluation of Wall Shear Stress Using the Finite Element Method

Kristian Valen‐Sendstad, J. Hron, Jørgen S. Dokken, Jana Brunátová
article en

Abstract

Wall shear stress (WSS) is a crucial hemodynamic quantity extensively studied in cardiovascular research, yet its numerical computation is not straightforward. This work compares WSS results obtained from two different finite element discretizations, quantifies the differences between continuous and discontinuous stresses, and introduces a modified variationally consistent method for WSS evaluation through the formulation of a boundary-flux problem. Two benchmark problems are considered: a 2D Stokes flow on a unit square and a 3D Poiseuille flow through a cylindrical pipe. These are followed by investigations of steady-state Navier-Stokes flow in two image-based, patient-specific aneurysms. The study focuses on P1/P1 stabilized and Taylor-Hood P2/P1 mixed finite elements for velocity and pressure. WSS is computed using either the proposed boundary-flux method or as a projection of tangential traction onto first order Lagrange (P1), discontinuous Galerkin first order (DG-1), or discontinuous Galerkin zero order (DG-0) space. For the P1/P1 stabilized element, the boundary-flux and P1 projection methods yielded equivalent results. With the P2/P1 element, the boundary-flux evaluation demonstrated faster convergence in the Poiseuille flow example but showed increased sensitivity to pressure field inaccuracies in image-based geometries compared to the projection method. Furthermore, a paradoxical degradation in WSS accuracy was observed when combining the P2/P1 element with fine boundary-layer meshes on a cylindrical geometry, an effect attributed to inherent geometric approximation errors. In aneurysm geometries, the P2/P1 element exhibited superior robustness to mesh size when evaluating average WSS and low shear area (LSA), outperforming the P1/P1 stabilized element. Projecting discontinuous finite element functions into continuous spaces can introduce artifacts, such as the Gibbs phenomenon. Consequently, it is crucial to carefully select the finite element space for boundary stress calculations, not only in applications involving WSS computations for aneurysms.

International Journal for Numerical Methods in Biomedical EngineeringVol. 41(9)
University of Groningen (NL), Charles University (CZ), Simula Research Laboratory (NO)
Openalex Percentile: Top 75%
Structural Analysis of Composite Materials
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.