Comparative molecular dynamics study of the temperature-dependent performance of NiFe and graphite catalysts in methane decomposition for hydrogen production

Abstract A comparative study of methane decomposition processes using NiFe catalyst, representing the transition metal group known for its ability to reduce activation energy, and graphite catalyst, representing carbon materials with diverse morphologies and abundant natural availability, was conducted using molecular dynamics simulations. The simulation findings suggest that a 100 K temperature increment results in only a very slight increase in the diffusion rate. The NiFe catalyst outperforms graphite in methane decomposition by providing both faster decomposition kinetics and significantly enhanced diffusion of carbon and hydrogen atoms. Nevertheless, the accumulation of these atomic species on the catalyst surface leads to the blockage of active sites and a decrease in catalytic activity. The activation energy required for the methane gas decomposition process with the NiFe catalyst is 0.20 eV, while with the graphite catalyst, it is 0.72 eV. In the methane gas decomposition process with NiFe catalyst, no CH, CH2, and CH3 bonds were found, indicating that methane decomposes directly and completely into hydrogen and carbon atoms separately. Meanwhile, with the graphite catalyst, the decomposition of CH4 into simpler compounds (CH, CH2, and CH3) was observed.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Clean Energy
Published
2025-08-29
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1093/ce/zkaf050
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Catalytic Processes in Materials Science
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.52

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Comparative molecular dynamics study of the temperature-dependent performance of NiFe and graphite catalysts in methane decomposition for hydrogen production

Ach Agus Dardiri, Siti Mariyah Ulfa, Mauludi Ariesto Pamungkas, Farid Surya Farista et al.
1 citations
Clean Energy
Catalytic Processes in Materials Science
0.52
article

Comparative molecular dynamics study of the temperature-dependent performance of NiFe and graphite catalysts in methane decomposition for hydrogen production

Ach Agus Dardiri, Siti Mariyah Ulfa, Mauludi Ariesto Pamungkas, Farid Surya Farista, Djoko Herry Santjojo, Azizul Abuhanifa, Akhmad Wahyudianto
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Abstract A comparative study of methane decomposition processes using NiFe catalyst, representing the transition metal group known for its ability to reduce activation energy, and graphite catalyst, representing carbon materials with diverse morphologies and abundant natural availability, was conducted using molecular dynamics simulations. The simulation findings suggest that a 100 K temperature increment results in only a very slight increase in the diffusion rate. The NiFe catalyst outperforms graphite in methane decomposition by providing both faster decomposition kinetics and significantly enhanced diffusion of carbon and hydrogen atoms. Nevertheless, the accumulation of these atomic species on the catalyst surface leads to the blockage of active sites and a decrease in catalytic activity. The activation energy required for the methane gas decomposition process with the NiFe catalyst is 0.20 eV, while with the graphite catalyst, it is 0.72 eV. In the methane gas decomposition process with NiFe catalyst, no CH, CH2, and CH3 bonds were found, indicating that methane decomposes directly and completely into hydrogen and carbon atoms separately. Meanwhile, with the graphite catalyst, the decomposition of CH4 into simpler compounds (CH, CH2, and CH3) was observed.

Clean EnergyVol. 9(6)
University of Brawijaya (ID)
Universitas Brawijaya
Openalex Percentile: Top 33%
Catalytic Processes in Materials Science
0.52
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.