Shifting production cycle from sea to RAS – what does the fish say?

In combined RAS (recirculating aquaculture system) and sea cage farming, fish are first reared in RAS for about 8 months and then transferred to sea cages for the one growing season. This method allows a shorter production cycle, more efficient nutrient uptake, and avoiding risks associated with open environment rearing. However, combining two different production methods and environments challenge ability of fish to adapt to the new farming environment. In this study, rainbow trout ( Oncorhynchus mykiss ) were raised in RAS and partial RAS (PRAS) and then transferred to freshwater flow-through system and brackish water cages in June and September according to common practices. We investigated: 1) Does water quality during initial farming influences success of transfers?, 2) Does growth of rainbow trout differ in different rearing environments after transfers?, and 3) Does size of rainbow trout and/or timing of transfers affect growth and stress regulation of rainbow trout? Our results support that neither the water quality nor system (RAS or PRAS) affected the growth or welfare of fish, whereas the larger fish transferred in September had challenges (e.g. lower growth) after transfer to brackish water cages. However, there are many uncertainties associated with the transfer performed in September. Understanding the reasons behind these current problems would allow a wider use of this production method in salmonid aquaculture. It would also allow development of new, more efficient and sustainable production cycles and strategies, adapted to different needs. • Growth of rainbow trout raised in RAS and PRAS differed after transfers to flow-through system and sea cages. • Both RAS and PRAS originated rainbow trout had the lowest growth in sea cages. • Size of rainbow trout and time of transfer affected growth of rainbow trout. • Smaller rainbow trout transferred in summer grew better than larger rainbow trout transferred in autumn. • Water quality of RAS or PRAS did not in itself affect growth after transfers.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Aquaculture
Published
2025-09-09
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aquaculture.2025.743175
Primary Topic
Marine and fisheries research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Shifting production cycle from sea to RAS – what does the fish say?

Harri Vehviläinen, Jani Pulkkinen, Jari Hänninen
Aquaculture
Marine and fisheries research
article

Shifting production cycle from sea to RAS – what does the fish say?

Harri Vehviläinen, Jani Pulkkinen, Jari Hänninen
article en

Abstract

In combined RAS (recirculating aquaculture system) and sea cage farming, fish are first reared in RAS for about 8 months and then transferred to sea cages for the one growing season. This method allows a shorter production cycle, more efficient nutrient uptake, and avoiding risks associated with open environment rearing. However, combining two different production methods and environments challenge ability of fish to adapt to the new farming environment. In this study, rainbow trout ( Oncorhynchus mykiss ) were raised in RAS and partial RAS (PRAS) and then transferred to freshwater flow-through system and brackish water cages in June and September according to common practices. We investigated: 1) Does water quality during initial farming influences success of transfers?, 2) Does growth of rainbow trout differ in different rearing environments after transfers?, and 3) Does size of rainbow trout and/or timing of transfers affect growth and stress regulation of rainbow trout? Our results support that neither the water quality nor system (RAS or PRAS) affected the growth or welfare of fish, whereas the larger fish transferred in September had challenges (e.g. lower growth) after transfer to brackish water cages. However, there are many uncertainties associated with the transfer performed in September. Understanding the reasons behind these current problems would allow a wider use of this production method in salmonid aquaculture. It would also allow development of new, more efficient and sustainable production cycles and strategies, adapted to different needs. • Growth of rainbow trout raised in RAS and PRAS differed after transfers to flow-through system and sea cages. • Both RAS and PRAS originated rainbow trout had the lowest growth in sea cages. • Size of rainbow trout and time of transfer affected growth of rainbow trout. • Smaller rainbow trout transferred in summer grew better than larger rainbow trout transferred in autumn. • Water quality of RAS or PRAS did not in itself affect growth after transfers.

AquacultureVol. 612
University of Turku (FI), Natural Resources Institute Finland (FI), University of Jyväskylä (FI)
Openalex Percentile: Top 77%
Marine and fisheries research
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.