Optimizing water management in greenhouse farming through an IoT-enabled monitoring system

Abstract Understanding the crop growth and yield response to variable irrigation and the relationship between crop eco-physiological and morphological parameters is critical for identifying a balanced irrigation management strategy and developing decision support systems for early detection and information for on-ground decisions. The Internet of Things model was constructed to be used in the permanent and continuous monitoring of plants through various measurements. The present study aimed to optimize water use, monitor environmental factors, and improve crop yield. The field experiment was conducted in a greenhouse at SEKEM Company for Biodynamic Agriculture in Egypt during the winter season of 2022–2023. Green bean plants ( Phaseolus vulgaris L.) were cultivated under two irrigation systems: surface drip irrigation (SDI) and subsurface drip irrigation (SSDI), with three irrigation levels of 100%, 80%, and 60% of the crop water requirements (CWR). This resulted in a total of six experimental treatments (T): T1, T3, and T5 for SDI; and T2, T4, and T6 for SSDI. An Internet of Things (IoT) unit equipped with sensors was installed to monitor air temperature, air humidity, and soil moisture, enabling the calculation of vapor pressure deficit (VPD). Data were collected daily throughout the growth stages. IoT unit with sensors were installed to monitor air temperature, air humidity, and soil moisture, enabling vapor pressure deficit (VPD) calculations. The measurements were collected daily during the growth stages. The field trial results demonstrated that SSDI at 100% CWR (T2) was recorded the lowest VPD values (1.34, 0.67, and 2.10 kPa) during development, Mid, and Late stage, respectively, while SDI at 60% CWR (T5) recorded the highest (1.77, 1.19, and 2.72 kPa) during development, Mid, and Late stage, respectively. Canopy temperatures were lower under SSDI (T2) compared to SDI (T5). Green bean yield significantly varied between irrigation methods. SDI yield ranged from 25.425 to 28.719 $${\text{t ha}}^{-1}$$ <mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"> <mml:msup> <mml:mrow> <mml:mtext>t ha</mml:mtext> </mml:mrow> <mml:mrow> <mml:mo>-</mml:mo> <mml:mn>1</mml:mn> </mml:mrow> </mml:msup> </mml:math> , with the highest (28.719 $${\text{t ha}}^{-1}$$ <mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"> <mml:msup> <mml:mrow> <mml:mtext>t ha</mml:mtext> </mml:mrow> <mml:mrow> <mml:mo>-</mml:mo> <mml:mn>1</mml:mn> </mml:mrow> </mml:msup> </mml:math> ) at 80% CWR (T3). while the SSDI yield ranged from 24.390 to 33.614 $${\text{t ha}}^{-1}$$ <mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"> <mml:msup> <mml:mrow> <mml:mtext>t ha</mml:mtext> </mml:mrow> <mml:mrow> <mml:mo>-</mml:mo> <mml:mn>1</mml:mn> </mml:mrow> </mml:msup> </mml:math> , with the maximum 33.614 $${\text{t ha}}^{-1}$$ <mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"> <mml:msup> <mml:mrow> <mml:mtext>t ha</mml:mtext> </mml:mrow> <mml:mrow> <mml:mo>-</mml:mo> <mml:mn>1</mml:mn> </mml:mrow> </mml:msup> </mml:math> recorded under 80% CWR (T4). Water productivity (WP) varied significantly, from 7.66 to 15.73 $${\text{kg m}}^{-3}$$ <mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"> <mml:msup> <mml:mrow> <mml:mtext>kg m</mml:mtext> </mml:mrow> <mml:mrow> <mml:mo>-</mml:mo> <mml:mn>3</mml:mn> </mml:mrow> </mml:msup> </mml:math> . The highest WP (15.73 $${\text{kg m}}^{-3}$$ <mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"> <mml:msup> <mml:mrow> <mml:mtext>kg m</mml:mtext> </mml:mrow> <mml:mrow> <mml:mo>-</mml:mo> <mml:mn>3</mml:mn> </mml:mrow> </mml:msup> </mml:math> ) was recorded under SSDI at 60% CWR (T6), while the lowest (7.66 $${\text{kg m}}^{-3}$$ <mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"> <mml:msup> <mml:mrow> <mml:mtext>kg m</mml:mtext> </mml:mrow> <mml:mrow> <mml:mo>-</mml:mo> <mml:mn>3</mml:mn> </mml:mrow> </mml:msup> </mml:math> ) occurred under SSDI at 100% CWR (T2). The study underscores IoT-based precision irrigation’s potential to maximize yields and enhance water efficiency, with SSDI proving more efficient at lower irrigation levels.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of the Saudi Society of Agricultural Sciences
Published
2025-08-14
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s44447-025-00039-2
Citations
2
Primary Topic
Greenhouse Technology and Climate Control
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
3.50
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Optimizing water management in greenhouse farming through an IoT-enabled monitoring system

Maha ALrajhi, Amal Mohamed Abdel-Hameed, Hamed G. Ghanem, M. H. Fayed et al.
2 citations
Journal of the Saudi Society of Agricultural Sciences
Greenhouse Technology and Climate Control
3.50
article

Optimizing water management in greenhouse farming through an IoT-enabled monitoring system

Maha ALrajhi, Amal Mohamed Abdel-Hameed, Hamed G. Ghanem, M. H. Fayed, Abdel-Rahman A. EL-Sheshny, Taha M. Elzanaty
article en
2 citations

Abstract

Abstract Understanding the crop growth and yield response to variable irrigation and the relationship between crop eco-physiological and morphological parameters is critical for identifying a balanced irrigation management strategy and developing decision support systems for early detection and information for on-ground decisions. The Internet of Things model was constructed to be used in the permanent and continuous monitoring of plants through various measurements. The present study aimed to optimize water use, monitor environmental factors, and improve crop yield. The field experiment was conducted in a greenhouse at SEKEM Company for Biodynamic Agriculture in Egypt during the winter season of 2022–2023. Green bean plants ( Phaseolus vulgaris L.) were cultivated under two irrigation systems: surface drip irrigation (SDI) and subsurface drip irrigation (SSDI), with three irrigation levels of 100%, 80%, and 60% of the crop water requirements (CWR). This resulted in a total of six experimental treatments (T): T1, T3, and T5 for SDI; and T2, T4, and T6 for SSDI. An Internet of Things (IoT) unit equipped with sensors was installed to monitor air temperature, air humidity, and soil moisture, enabling the calculation of vapor pressure deficit (VPD). Data were collected daily throughout the growth stages. IoT unit with sensors were installed to monitor air temperature, air humidity, and soil moisture, enabling vapor pressure deficit (VPD) calculations. The measurements were collected daily during the growth stages. The field trial results demonstrated that SSDI at 100% CWR (T2) was recorded the lowest VPD values (1.34, 0.67, and 2.10 kPa) during development, Mid, and Late stage, respectively, while SDI at 60% CWR (T5) recorded the highest (1.77, 1.19, and 2.72 kPa) during development, Mid, and Late stage, respectively. Canopy temperatures were lower under SSDI (T2) compared to SDI (T5). Green bean yield significantly varied between irrigation methods. SDI yield ranged from 25.425 to 28.719 $${\text{t ha}}^{-1}$$ <mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"> <mml:msup> <mml:mrow> <mml:mtext>t ha</mml:mtext> </mml:mrow> <mml:mrow> <mml:mo>-</mml:mo> <mml:mn>1</mml:mn> </mml:mrow> </mml:msup> </mml:math> , with the highest (28.719 $${\text{t ha}}^{-1}$$ <mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"> <mml:msup> <mml:mrow> <mml:mtext>t ha</mml:mtext> </mml:mrow> <mml:mrow> <mml:mo>-</mml:mo> <mml:mn>1</mml:mn> </mml:mrow> </mml:msup> </mml:math> ) at 80% CWR (T3). while the SSDI yield ranged from 24.390 to 33.614 $${\text{t ha}}^{-1}$$ <mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"> <mml:msup> <mml:mrow> <mml:mtext>t ha</mml:mtext> </mml:mrow> <mml:mrow> <mml:mo>-</mml:mo> <mml:mn>1</mml:mn> </mml:mrow> </mml:msup> </mml:math> , with the maximum 33.614 $${\text{t ha}}^{-1}$$ <mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"> <mml:msup> <mml:mrow> <mml:mtext>t ha</mml:mtext> </mml:mrow> <mml:mrow> <mml:mo>-</mml:mo> <mml:mn>1</mml:mn> </mml:mrow> </mml:msup> </mml:math> recorded under 80% CWR (T4). Water productivity (WP) varied significantly, from 7.66 to 15.73 $${\text{kg m}}^{-3}$$ <mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"> <mml:msup> <mml:mrow> <mml:mtext>kg m</mml:mtext> </mml:mrow> <mml:mrow> <mml:mo>-</mml:mo> <mml:mn>3</mml:mn> </mml:mrow> </mml:msup> </mml:math> . The highest WP (15.73 $${\text{kg m}}^{-3}$$ <mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"> <mml:msup> <mml:mrow> <mml:mtext>kg m</mml:mtext> </mml:mrow> <mml:mrow> <mml:mo>-</mml:mo> <mml:mn>3</mml:mn> </mml:mrow> </mml:msup> </mml:math> ) was recorded under SSDI at 60% CWR (T6), while the lowest (7.66 $${\text{kg m}}^{-3}$$ <mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"> <mml:msup> <mml:mrow> <mml:mtext>kg m</mml:mtext> </mml:mrow> <mml:mrow> <mml:mo>-</mml:mo> <mml:mn>3</mml:mn> </mml:mrow> </mml:msup> </mml:math> ) occurred under SSDI at 100% CWR (T2). The study underscores IoT-based precision irrigation’s potential to maximize yields and enhance water efficiency, with SSDI proving more efficient at lower irrigation levels.

Journal of the Saudi Society of Agricultural SciencesVol. 24(4)
Ministry of Water Resources and Irrigation (EG), Al-Azhar University (EG), Agricultural Research Center (EG)
Openalex Percentile: Top 7%
Greenhouse Technology and Climate Control
3.50
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.