Dismantling of nuclear facilities, radioactive waste and materials management, circular economy and sustainable development

Decommissioning of nuclear facilities and sites’ clean-up can lead to the production of significant amount of radioactive waste and materials: steel, concrete, soils, etc. Traditionally, these activities have been managed according to radiation protection criteria, such as clearance levels based on a 10 µSv.year-1 criterion. However, the volumes of waste and materials involved are leading many countries to question their strategy, considering for instance the risk of saturation of radioactive waste storage buildings and repositories, or even the absence of storage facilities. Production of large volumes of waste may also be considered in contradiction to the principles of the circular economy promoted by the European Union, sustainable development objectives and even the views of some stakeholders. As part of the HARPERS project, funded by the European Commission, several case studies on the implementation of good practice for the management of radioactive waste and materials have been investigated to identify useful lessons from a circular economy perspective, both in terms of standards and regulations and operational aspects. This article highlights some of the main findings.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Radioprotection
Published
2025-09-09
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1051/radiopro/2025034
Primary Topic
Graphite, nuclear technology, radiation studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Dismantling of nuclear facilities, radioactive waste and materials management, circular economy and sustainable development

Ludovic Vaillant, Stephen M. Wickham
Radioprotection
Graphite, nuclear technology, radiation studies
article

Dismantling of nuclear facilities, radioactive waste and materials management, circular economy and sustainable development

Ludovic Vaillant, Stephen M. Wickham
article en

Abstract

Decommissioning of nuclear facilities and sites’ clean-up can lead to the production of significant amount of radioactive waste and materials: steel, concrete, soils, etc. Traditionally, these activities have been managed according to radiation protection criteria, such as clearance levels based on a 10 µSv.year-1 criterion. However, the volumes of waste and materials involved are leading many countries to question their strategy, considering for instance the risk of saturation of radioactive waste storage buildings and repositories, or even the absence of storage facilities. Production of large volumes of waste may also be considered in contradiction to the principles of the circular economy promoted by the European Union, sustainable development objectives and even the views of some stakeholders. As part of the HARPERS project, funded by the European Commission, several case studies on the implementation of good practice for the management of radioactive waste and materials have been investigated to identify useful lessons from a circular economy perspective, both in terms of standards and regulations and operational aspects. This article highlights some of the main findings.

RadioprotectionVol. 61(1)
Tractebel Engineering (Belgium) (BE), Galson Sciences (GB), CEPN (FR), Sogin (Italy) (IT), Agence Nationale pour la Gestion des Déchets Radioactifs (FR), Cyclicor (Sweden) (SE), Life Cycle Engineering (United States) (US), Nuclear Research Institute Rez (Czechia) (CZ)
Openalex Percentile: Top 81%
Graphite, nuclear technology, radiation studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.