Bridge damage characterisation using machine learning: methods and advances

Bridge deflection is a descriptive proxy for potential bridge deterioration and damage. It can be used to determine bridge condition and link this to actionable damage states for timely and accurate damage mitigation and adaptation. While design guidelines mandate strict deflection control at the design stage, primarily for serviceability, there are currently no assessment guidelines or available framework to facilitate bridge damage identification based on bridge deck deflections. A thorough review of the literature revealed that the main reason that deflection is not used as a damage proxy is the complex mechanics underlying its development. A state-of-the-art review is presented to efficiently characterise global bridge damage related to deck deflections. The approach goes beyond existing methods by striving to reveal the causes of bridge deck deflection and their interdependencies, offering a clearer understanding and interpretation of the factors driving this phenomenon. Given the significant uncertainties around deflection causes and the impracticality of complex, tedious analyses for large bridge portfolios, Machine Learning (ML) is proposed as a scalable solution that reduces modelling effort, enhances explainability, and can successfully correlate deflections with damage levels. It then proposes a conceptual Physics-Based ML approach that correlates deflection patterns with actionable damage states, offering a roadmap for future research to enhance bridge damage characterisation. Unlike prior studies, it integrates all major deterioration mechanisms and their interactions into a unified deflection analysis.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Results in Engineering
Published
2025-09-09
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rineng.2025.107192
Citations
3
Primary Topic
Infrastructure Maintenance and Monitoring
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
2.86
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Bridge damage characterisation using machine learning: methods and advances

Ivan Izonin, Stergios-Aristoteles Mitoulis, Francesco Pentassuglia
3 citations
Results in Engineering
Infrastructure Maintenance and Monitoring
2.86
article

Bridge damage characterisation using machine learning: methods and advances

Ivan Izonin, Stergios-Aristoteles Mitoulis, Francesco Pentassuglia
article en
3 citations

Abstract

Bridge deflection is a descriptive proxy for potential bridge deterioration and damage. It can be used to determine bridge condition and link this to actionable damage states for timely and accurate damage mitigation and adaptation. While design guidelines mandate strict deflection control at the design stage, primarily for serviceability, there are currently no assessment guidelines or available framework to facilitate bridge damage identification based on bridge deck deflections. A thorough review of the literature revealed that the main reason that deflection is not used as a damage proxy is the complex mechanics underlying its development. A state-of-the-art review is presented to efficiently characterise global bridge damage related to deck deflections. The approach goes beyond existing methods by striving to reveal the causes of bridge deck deflection and their interdependencies, offering a clearer understanding and interpretation of the factors driving this phenomenon. Given the significant uncertainties around deflection causes and the impracticality of complex, tedious analyses for large bridge portfolios, Machine Learning (ML) is proposed as a scalable solution that reduces modelling effort, enhances explainability, and can successfully correlate deflections with damage levels. It then proposes a conceptual Physics-Based ML approach that correlates deflection patterns with actionable damage states, offering a roadmap for future research to enhance bridge damage characterisation. Unlike prior studies, it integrates all major deterioration mechanisms and their interactions into a unified deflection analysis.

Results in EngineeringVol. 28
Openalex Percentile: Top 9%
Infrastructure Maintenance and Monitoring
2.86
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.