Systematics and phylogenetic relationships of the Australian Agaristinae (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae) based on morphology, including a revised checklist of the subfamily

The subfamily Agaristinae from Australia comprise a small group of largely diurnal and brightly coloured moths, but their phylogenetic relationships are largely unknown. Cladistic analysis of nearly all extant genera (20 out of 21, or 95%) and most described species (38 out of 45, or 84%) based on 39 male genitalic and adult morphological characters revealed several incongruencies with the current generic classification. Strict consensus and 50% majority rule analyses confirmed monophyly of the subfamily. The monotypic genus Cremnophora Hampson, 1901 (type species: Apina angasii Walker, 1855, a junior synonym and secondary homonym of Agrista [sic] angasii Angas, 1847) is excluded from the Agaristinae because the morphology of the male genitalia suggest it probably belongs in the Amphipyrinae. Except for a few species-groups, deep level relationships among most clades were largely unresolved. Most genera were monophyletic, but Zalissa Walker, 1865, Leucogonia Hampson, 1908, Argyrolepidia Hampson, 1901 and Idalima Turner, 1903 were all non-monophyletic. Sister-group relationships were recovered between the monotypic genera Apina Walker, 1855 and Agaristodes Hampson, 1908, and between Phalaenoides Lewin, 1805 and Comocrus Jordan, 1896. Morphological and other evidence suggest each of these pairs are congeneric; thus, we propose the following new combinations following synonymy of Agaristodes syn. nov. with Apina and Comocrus syn. nov. with Phalaenoides: Apina feisthamelii (Herrich-Schäffer, [1853]) comb. nov. and Phalaenoides behri (Angas, 1847) comb. nov. Idalima (type species: Agarista affinis Boisduval, 1832) emerged as polyphyletic, with Idalima affinis (Boisduval, 1832) and Idalima metasticta Hampson, 1910 showing a closer relationship to Periscepta Turner, 1920 than to Idalima aethrias (Turner, 1908) or Idalima leonora (Doubleday, 1846). Thus, we synonymise Periscepta syn. nov. with Idalima and transfer Periscepta polysticta (Butler, 1875) and Periscepta butleri (Swinhoe, 1892) to this genus, resulting in the following new combinations: Idalima polysticta (Butler, 1875) comb. nov. and Idalima butleri (Swinhoe, 1892) comb. nov. A revised checklist of the Australian fauna is presented, including nomenclature for all valid subspecies.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Records of the Australian Museum
Published
2025-09-09
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3853/j.2201-4349.77.2025.1911
Primary Topic
Lepidoptera: Biology and Taxonomy
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Systematics and phylogenetic relationships of the Australian Agaristinae (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae) based on morphology, including a revised checklist of the subfamily

Michael F. Braby, Sharyn Wragg
Records of the Australian Museum
Lepidoptera: Biology and Taxonomy
article

Systematics and phylogenetic relationships of the Australian Agaristinae (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae) based on morphology, including a revised checklist of the subfamily

Michael F. Braby, Sharyn Wragg
article en

Abstract

The subfamily Agaristinae from Australia comprise a small group of largely diurnal and brightly coloured moths, but their phylogenetic relationships are largely unknown. Cladistic analysis of nearly all extant genera (20 out of 21, or 95%) and most described species (38 out of 45, or 84%) based on 39 male genitalic and adult morphological characters revealed several incongruencies with the current generic classification. Strict consensus and 50% majority rule analyses confirmed monophyly of the subfamily. The monotypic genus Cremnophora Hampson, 1901 (type species: Apina angasii Walker, 1855, a junior synonym and secondary homonym of Agrista [sic] angasii Angas, 1847) is excluded from the Agaristinae because the morphology of the male genitalia suggest it probably belongs in the Amphipyrinae. Except for a few species-groups, deep level relationships among most clades were largely unresolved. Most genera were monophyletic, but Zalissa Walker, 1865, Leucogonia Hampson, 1908, Argyrolepidia Hampson, 1901 and Idalima Turner, 1903 were all non-monophyletic. Sister-group relationships were recovered between the monotypic genera Apina Walker, 1855 and Agaristodes Hampson, 1908, and between Phalaenoides Lewin, 1805 and Comocrus Jordan, 1896. Morphological and other evidence suggest each of these pairs are congeneric; thus, we propose the following new combinations following synonymy of Agaristodes syn. nov. with Apina and Comocrus syn. nov. with Phalaenoides: Apina feisthamelii (Herrich-Schäffer, [1853]) comb. nov. and Phalaenoides behri (Angas, 1847) comb. nov. Idalima (type species: Agarista affinis Boisduval, 1832) emerged as polyphyletic, with Idalima affinis (Boisduval, 1832) and Idalima metasticta Hampson, 1910 showing a closer relationship to Periscepta Turner, 1920 than to Idalima aethrias (Turner, 1908) or Idalima leonora (Doubleday, 1846). Thus, we synonymise Periscepta syn. nov. with Idalima and transfer Periscepta polysticta (Butler, 1875) and Periscepta butleri (Swinhoe, 1892) to this genus, resulting in the following new combinations: Idalima polysticta (Butler, 1875) comb. nov. and Idalima butleri (Swinhoe, 1892) comb. nov. A revised checklist of the Australian fauna is presented, including nomenclature for all valid subspecies.

Records of the Australian MuseumVol. 77(3)
Openalex Percentile: Top 74%
Lepidoptera: Biology and Taxonomy
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.