Complexidade do sistema da lei de arbitragem brasileira N.º 9.307, de 23 de setembro de 1996: Sistema estatal nem sempre se mostra aberto ou acessível <i>Vale a pena litigar quando se pode optar pela arbitragem?</i>

This study analyzes Law No. 9,307/1996, which established arbitration in Brazil, highlighting its relevance in the national and international legal and economic contexts. The law emerges as a response to the deficiencies of traditional judicial proceedings, characterized by excessive delays, high costs, inequality between the parties, and low effectiveness in enforcing decisions. Arbitration is presented as an alternative, offering greater speed, flexibility, and autonomy to the parties. However, tensions remain between the autonomy of the litigants’ will and the need for judicial intervention, which gives the law an unstable character. This paper discusses these contradictions based on theoretical foundations and reflections developed during a doctoral course in Legal and Social Sciences at the Universidad del Museo Social Argentino.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
RCMOS - Revista Científica Multidisciplinar O Saber
Published
2025-09-08
DOI
https://doi.org/10.51473/rcmos.v1i2.2025.1358
Primary Topic
Brazilian Legal Issues
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Complexidade do sistema da lei de arbitragem brasileira N.º 9.307, de 23 de setembro de 1996: Sistema estatal nem sempre se mostra aberto ou acessível Vale a pena litigar quando se pode optar pela arbitragem?

silvia katherine pacheco teixeira
RCMOS - Revista Científica Multidisciplinar O Saber
Brazilian Legal Issues
article

Complexidade do sistema da lei de arbitragem brasileira N.º 9.307, de 23 de setembro de 1996: Sistema estatal nem sempre se mostra aberto ou acessível Vale a pena litigar quando se pode optar pela arbitragem?

silvia katherine pacheco teixeira
article en

Abstract

This study analyzes Law No. 9,307/1996, which established arbitration in Brazil, highlighting its relevance in the national and international legal and economic contexts. The law emerges as a response to the deficiencies of traditional judicial proceedings, characterized by excessive delays, high costs, inequality between the parties, and low effectiveness in enforcing decisions. Arbitration is presented as an alternative, offering greater speed, flexibility, and autonomy to the parties. However, tensions remain between the autonomy of the litigants’ will and the need for judicial intervention, which gives the law an unstable character. This paper discusses these contradictions based on theoretical foundations and reflections developed during a doctoral course in Legal and Social Sciences at the Universidad del Museo Social Argentino.

RCMOS - Revista Científica Multidisciplinar O SaberVol. 1(2)
Openalex Percentile: Top 62%
Brazilian Legal Issues
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.