Validation of the Adapted eHEALS Questionnaire for Assessing Digital Health Literacy in Social Media: A Pilot Study

<b>Background:</b> Digital health literacy is crucial for navigating social media as a primary health information source. However, its interactive and unregulated nature fosters misinformation, requiring critical evaluation skills. Existing tools assess general internet use, but no validated instrument measures competencies specific to social media. This study aimed to adapt and validate the eHealth Literacy Scale (eHEALS) for this context. <b>Methods</b>: A content validation process was conducted with 33 experts, who evaluated the clarity, coherence, and relevance of the adapted questionnaire using item-level (I-CVI) and scale-level (S-CVI) content validity indices. A pilot study was then carried out with 250 participants to assess the instrument's reliability and feasibility, measured through Cronbach's alpha and McDonald's Omega. <b>Results</b>: The adapted eHEALS demonstrated excellent content validity (S-CVI > 0.90) and high internal consistency (Cronbach's α = 0.92; McDonald's Ω = 0.92). The tool effectively captures key competencies for evaluating and applying health information in social media contexts, with exploratory factor analysis confirming a unidimensional structure that explained over 60% of the variance, supporting its robustness for use in population-based studies. <b>Conclusions</b>: This validated instrument provides a reliable method for assessing digital health literacy in social media, supporting the development of educational interventions to enhance critical appraisal skills and mitigate the impact of misinformation.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Nursing Reports
Published
2025-09-09
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/nursrep15090330
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Health Literacy and Information Accessibility
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
2.82
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Validation of the Adapted eHEALS Questionnaire for Assessing Digital Health Literacy in Social Media: A Pilot Study

José Luis Palazón-Fernández, Elena Chamorro Rebollo, Isabel Lepiani, Raúl Quintana Alonso et al.
1 citations
Nursing Reports
Health Literacy and Information Accessibility
2.82
article

Validation of the Adapted eHEALS Questionnaire for Assessing Digital Health Literacy in Social Media: A Pilot Study

José Luis Palazón-Fernández, Elena Chamorro Rebollo, Isabel Lepiani, Raúl Quintana Alonso, Anna Bocchino, Lucía Carton Erlandsson
article en
1 citations

Abstract

<b>Background:</b> Digital health literacy is crucial for navigating social media as a primary health information source. However, its interactive and unregulated nature fosters misinformation, requiring critical evaluation skills. Existing tools assess general internet use, but no validated instrument measures competencies specific to social media. This study aimed to adapt and validate the eHealth Literacy Scale (eHEALS) for this context. <b>Methods</b>: A content validation process was conducted with 33 experts, who evaluated the clarity, coherence, and relevance of the adapted questionnaire using item-level (I-CVI) and scale-level (S-CVI) content validity indices. A pilot study was then carried out with 250 participants to assess the instrument's reliability and feasibility, measured through Cronbach's alpha and McDonald's Omega. <b>Results</b>: The adapted eHEALS demonstrated excellent content validity (S-CVI > 0.90) and high internal consistency (Cronbach's α = 0.92; McDonald's Ω = 0.92). The tool effectively captures key competencies for evaluating and applying health information in social media contexts, with exploratory factor analysis confirming a unidimensional structure that explained over 60% of the variance, supporting its robustness for use in population-based studies. <b>Conclusions</b>: This validated instrument provides a reliable method for assessing digital health literacy in social media, supporting the development of educational interventions to enhance critical appraisal skills and mitigate the impact of misinformation.

Nursing ReportsVol. 15(9)
Universidad de Cádiz (ES), Universidad Pontificia de Salamanca (ES), Hospital Universitario Fundación Alcorcón (ES)
Openalex Percentile: Top 8%
Health Literacy and Information Accessibility
2.82
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.