Synthesis of Multi-Criteria Decision-Making Applications in Facilities Management and Building Maintenance: Trends, Methods, and Future Research Directions

Building maintenance decisions are complex and often influenced by various factors. Multi-criteria decision-making (MCDM) methods have been widely applied to address this complexity, yet guidance on selecting the most appropriate method for specific problems remains limited. Considering these, the purpose of this study is to provide a guidance for the nexus of MCDM methods and facilities management (FM) and building maintenance with the aim of supporting the selection of the most appropriate MCDM method for a specific problem. To achieve this, the study first offers a comprehensive overview of MCDM applications in FM and building maintenance through a systematic literature review guided by the PRISMA framework combined with scientometric analysis. This approach identifies key trends, reviews the methods most frequently employed, and outlines future research directions. From an initial pool of 4291 records retrieved from Scopus and Web of Science between 2000 and 2024, 107 studies were further analyzed. Using VOSviewer and Bibliometrix, the review maps the application of MCDM methods in FM and building maintenance over this period. As a major outcome of the study, a contextual MCDM Method Selection Matrix is developed, linking specific FM and maintenance problems to the most suitable MCDM methods. The findings reveal growing adoption of hybrid MCDM methods and highlight persistent challenges, including subjectivity, uncertainty, expert qualifications, methodological gaps, and technology integration in the decision-making process. By providing structured guidance on method selection, the contextual MCDM Method Selection Matrix supports researchers and practitioners in achieving consistent, data-driven, and context-sensitive decision-making, ultimately enhancing the longevity, efficiency, and sustainability of the built environment.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Buildings
Published
2025-09-09
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/buildings15183258
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Multi-Criteria Decision Making
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
2.11
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Synthesis of Multi-Criteria Decision-Making Applications in Facilities Management and Building Maintenance: Trends, Methods, and Future Research Directions

Mahdi Anbari Moghadam, Deniz Besiktepe
1 citations
Buildings
Multi-Criteria Decision Making
2.11
article

Synthesis of Multi-Criteria Decision-Making Applications in Facilities Management and Building Maintenance: Trends, Methods, and Future Research Directions

Mahdi Anbari Moghadam, Deniz Besiktepe
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Building maintenance decisions are complex and often influenced by various factors. Multi-criteria decision-making (MCDM) methods have been widely applied to address this complexity, yet guidance on selecting the most appropriate method for specific problems remains limited. Considering these, the purpose of this study is to provide a guidance for the nexus of MCDM methods and facilities management (FM) and building maintenance with the aim of supporting the selection of the most appropriate MCDM method for a specific problem. To achieve this, the study first offers a comprehensive overview of MCDM applications in FM and building maintenance through a systematic literature review guided by the PRISMA framework combined with scientometric analysis. This approach identifies key trends, reviews the methods most frequently employed, and outlines future research directions. From an initial pool of 4291 records retrieved from Scopus and Web of Science between 2000 and 2024, 107 studies were further analyzed. Using VOSviewer and Bibliometrix, the review maps the application of MCDM methods in FM and building maintenance over this period. As a major outcome of the study, a contextual MCDM Method Selection Matrix is developed, linking specific FM and maintenance problems to the most suitable MCDM methods. The findings reveal growing adoption of hybrid MCDM methods and highlight persistent challenges, including subjectivity, uncertainty, expert qualifications, methodological gaps, and technology integration in the decision-making process. By providing structured guidance on method selection, the contextual MCDM Method Selection Matrix supports researchers and practitioners in achieving consistent, data-driven, and context-sensitive decision-making, ultimately enhancing the longevity, efficiency, and sustainability of the built environment.

BuildingsVol. 15(18)
Purdue University West Lafayette (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 10%
Multi-Criteria Decision Making
2.11
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Synthesis of Multi-Criteria Decision-Making Applications in Facilities Management and Building Maintenance: Trends, Methods, and Future Research Directions — Mahdi Anbari Moghadam, Deniz Besiktepe · Buildings (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS