Assessing Attitudes Towards Coliving in Niš: A Survey-Based Analysis of Housing Preferences and Social Perceptions
<p>This study explores the feasibility and social acceptance of coliving as an alternative housing model in Niš, Serbia. The primary objective of the research is to assess awareness, preferences, and concerns regarding coliving compared to traditional renting among potential users, including students, young professionals, digital nomads, and remote workers. The research employs a quantitative survey methodology, collecting data through an online questionnaire distributed among targeted demographics in Niš. The survey includes multiple-choice questions covering demographic factors, housing preferences, pricing expectations, and cultural attitudes toward shared living arrangements.</p> <p>By analyzing the collected data, this study aims to identify key factors influencing housing choices and perceptions of coliving in Niš. The findings will provide insights into the potential demand for coliving spaces, the main incentives and deterrents for prospective residents, and the economic and social factors that could impact the successful implementation of coliving projects. This study contributes to a broader understanding of how coliving can be adapted to local contexts, offering a potential model for sustainable urban housing development in mid-sized cities. The results of this research will be valuable for architects, urban planners, and investors exploring coliving as a viable housing solution in Niš. Further research will be needed to assess the long-term economic viability and cultural acceptance of coliving in the region.</p>
Authors
- Slaviša Kondić (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0146-6756)
- Katarina Medar (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5876-4797)
- N. Randjelovic
- Sofija Ickovski
Institutions
- University of Nis (RS)
Publication Details
- Published
- 2025-09-09
- DOI
- https://doi.org/10.62683/sinarg2025.138
- Primary Topic
- Regional Development and Policy
- Type
- article
- Field-Weighted Citation Impact
- 0.00