Climate Change and the Revival of Cold War Rivalries: A Neorealist Study of Arctic Geopolitics

Climate change-induced warming is slowly transforming the Arctic frozen frontier into a strategic fault line of the 21st century. This paper argues that climate change acts as a structural catalyst for rivalry and struggle for relative gains, intensifying the security dilemma among global powers—Russia, the United States, and China—by unlocking sea routes and exposing resources at an unprecedented rate. The study analyzes Moscow's militarization, territorial tactics, and energy projects; Washington's alliances and some of its own deterrence and freedom-of-navigation postures; and Beijing's economic and scientific diplomacy in accord with Neo-realism as indicative of struggles for relative gains rather than cooperative governance. Modern forms of militarization, backed by bloc postures, harken to the Cold War period; however, the Arctic competition today stands out for its multipolarity, with China emerging as the third actor, and institutions playing a limited role. The study concludes that while the Arctic is unlikely to evolve into a full-scale Cold War 2.0, it will continue to be shaped by a managed security dilemma, marked by persistent tension, ongoing militarization, and the structural impacts of climate change.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
ACADEMIA International Journal for Social Sciences
Published
2025-09-09
DOI
https://doi.org/10.63056/acad.004.03.0740
Primary Topic
Arctic and Russian Policy Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Climate Change and the Revival of Cold War Rivalries: A Neorealist Study of Arctic Geopolitics

Muhammad Ismail Qaddus, Roha Rizwan, Afeefa Anees Raja
1 links
ACADEMIA International Journal for Social Sciences
Arctic and Russian Policy Studies
article

Climate Change and the Revival of Cold War Rivalries: A Neorealist Study of Arctic Geopolitics

Muhammad Ismail Qaddus, Roha Rizwan, Afeefa Anees Raja
article en

Abstract

Climate change-induced warming is slowly transforming the Arctic frozen frontier into a strategic fault line of the 21st century. This paper argues that climate change acts as a structural catalyst for rivalry and struggle for relative gains, intensifying the security dilemma among global powers—Russia, the United States, and China—by unlocking sea routes and exposing resources at an unprecedented rate. The study analyzes Moscow's militarization, territorial tactics, and energy projects; Washington's alliances and some of its own deterrence and freedom-of-navigation postures; and Beijing's economic and scientific diplomacy in accord with Neo-realism as indicative of struggles for relative gains rather than cooperative governance. Modern forms of militarization, backed by bloc postures, harken to the Cold War period; however, the Arctic competition today stands out for its multipolarity, with China emerging as the third actor, and institutions playing a limited role. The study concludes that while the Arctic is unlikely to evolve into a full-scale Cold War 2.0, it will continue to be shaped by a managed security dilemma, marked by persistent tension, ongoing militarization, and the structural impacts of climate change.

ACADEMIA International Journal for Social SciencesVol. 4(3)
University of Gujrat (PK)
Openalex Percentile: Top 67%
Arctic and Russian Policy Studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.