A multi-scenario framework for quantifying flood hazard and exposure accounting for runoff-driven uncertainty in global flood models

With growing populations and an increasing frequency of flood events, large-scale flood hazard assessment (LSFHA) and exposure analyses have become critically important. Global Flood Models (GFMs) significantly contribute to these efforts by simulating flood dynamics based on runoff inputs from Land Surface Models (LSMs), Global Hydrological Models (GHMs), or Reanalysis datasets. However, GFM outputs remain highly sensitive to runoff input choice, leading to substantial uncertainty in LSFHA. To address this challenge, we develop a multi-scenario framework integrating diverse runoff forcings into the CaMa-Flood GFM to capture a plausible range of hazard and exposure outcome scenarios, ranging from optimistic to conservative. The framework defines optimistic and conservative scenarios as the minimum and maximum simulated flood depth among all simulations, while the best-case is derived from the most efficient and validated simulation. ERA5-Reanalysis runoff forced streamflow simulation emerges as the most efficient, achieving Nash-Sutcliffe efficiency greater than 0.5 at approximately 50 % of analysed gauge stations, thus representing the best-case scenario. For a precise estimation of the return period flood depth, multiple parametric and non-parametric distributions are employed in frequency analysis. Hazard analysis for a 1-in-100-year flood event reveals around 48 % (range: 20 % - 60 %) of India's land area falls in the disastrous hazard class, approximating 1.6 (range: 0.65-1.95) million km<sup>2</sup>. Exposure analysis, aligning closely with government estimates and previous studies, indicates approximately 690 million people (range: 335-786 million) are exposed to significant flood risk. Validated using India as a case study, this scalable framework offers an open-source tool enabling national-scale risk-informed decision-making, addressing runoff-driven uncertainty critical for both immediate and long-term flood risk management.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
The Science of The Total Environment
Published
2025-09-09
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2025.180381
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Flood Risk Assessment and Management
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.11
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

A multi-scenario framework for quantifying flood hazard and exposure accounting for runoff-driven uncertainty in global flood models

Jayesh Parmar, Subhankar Karmakar
1 citations
The Science of The Total Environment
Flood Risk Assessment and Management
1.11
article

A multi-scenario framework for quantifying flood hazard and exposure accounting for runoff-driven uncertainty in global flood models

Jayesh Parmar, Subhankar Karmakar
article en
1 citations

Abstract

With growing populations and an increasing frequency of flood events, large-scale flood hazard assessment (LSFHA) and exposure analyses have become critically important. Global Flood Models (GFMs) significantly contribute to these efforts by simulating flood dynamics based on runoff inputs from Land Surface Models (LSMs), Global Hydrological Models (GHMs), or Reanalysis datasets. However, GFM outputs remain highly sensitive to runoff input choice, leading to substantial uncertainty in LSFHA. To address this challenge, we develop a multi-scenario framework integrating diverse runoff forcings into the CaMa-Flood GFM to capture a plausible range of hazard and exposure outcome scenarios, ranging from optimistic to conservative. The framework defines optimistic and conservative scenarios as the minimum and maximum simulated flood depth among all simulations, while the best-case is derived from the most efficient and validated simulation. ERA5-Reanalysis runoff forced streamflow simulation emerges as the most efficient, achieving Nash-Sutcliffe efficiency greater than 0.5 at approximately 50 % of analysed gauge stations, thus representing the best-case scenario. For a precise estimation of the return period flood depth, multiple parametric and non-parametric distributions are employed in frequency analysis. Hazard analysis for a 1-in-100-year flood event reveals around 48 % (range: 20 % - 60 %) of India's land area falls in the disastrous hazard class, approximating 1.6 (range: 0.65-1.95) million km<sup>2</sup>. Exposure analysis, aligning closely with government estimates and previous studies, indicates approximately 690 million people (range: 335-786 million) are exposed to significant flood risk. Validated using India as a case study, this scalable framework offers an open-source tool enabling national-scale risk-informed decision-making, addressing runoff-driven uncertainty critical for both immediate and long-term flood risk management.

The Science of The Total EnvironmentVol. 1000
Indian Institute of Technology Bombay (IN)
Openalex Percentile: Top 20%
Flood Risk Assessment and Management
1.11
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.