A Comparative Study Between Dexmedetomidine and Fentanyl as Adjuvant with Bupivacaine in Epidural Anesthesia in a Patient Undergoing Total Hip Replacement

Background: After total hip replacement, analgesic demand is very significant due to its link to severe early postoperative pain. Enhancing rehabilitation protocols and pain management strategies has a major influence on the results of the surgery. Aims and Objectives: This study compares the duration of motor block, the time it takes for sensory block to start, the duration of sensory block to start, the adverse effects of drugs in two groups, post-operative analgesia and the amount of time it takes to take the first dose of analgesic needed during the recovery period. Methods: This is a double-blinded randomized and comparative study for which 60 patients were selected out of which 30 patients had in group BD and 30 patients had in group BF. Patients were allocated into 2 groups: groupBD (0.25% bupivacaine 15 ml and dexmedetomidine-1 ml, i.e., 50 micrograms)- 30 patients and group-BF (0.25% bupivacaine 15 ml and fentanyl-1 ml, i.e., 50 micrograms)-30 patients and compared. Results: There was a statistically significant difference (p<0.0001) in the mean length of sensory block, motor block, and mean time commencement of sensory block between the two groups. Conclusion: The study concludes that dexmedetomidine, when used as an adjuvant to epidural bupivacaine, exhibits a quick start of sensory block, a shorter time to reach maximal sensory level, a longer duration of analgesia, and a longer duration of motor blockade than fentanyl.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
International Journal of Pharmaceutical Quality Assurance
Published
2025-03-25
DOI
https://doi.org/10.25258/ijpqa.16.1.14
Primary Topic
Anesthesia and Pain Management
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

A Comparative Study Between Dexmedetomidine and Fentanyl as Adjuvant with Bupivacaine in Epidural Anesthesia in a Patient Undergoing Total Hip Replacement

Pradip Kumar Mandal, Burulukui Hembram
International Journal of Pharmaceutical Quality Assurance
Anesthesia and Pain Management
article

A Comparative Study Between Dexmedetomidine and Fentanyl as Adjuvant with Bupivacaine in Epidural Anesthesia in a Patient Undergoing Total Hip Replacement

Pradip Kumar Mandal, Burulukui Hembram
article en

Abstract

Background: After total hip replacement, analgesic demand is very significant due to its link to severe early postoperative pain. Enhancing rehabilitation protocols and pain management strategies has a major influence on the results of the surgery. Aims and Objectives: This study compares the duration of motor block, the time it takes for sensory block to start, the duration of sensory block to start, the adverse effects of drugs in two groups, post-operative analgesia and the amount of time it takes to take the first dose of analgesic needed during the recovery period. Methods: This is a double-blinded randomized and comparative study for which 60 patients were selected out of which 30 patients had in group BD and 30 patients had in group BF. Patients were allocated into 2 groups: groupBD (0.25% bupivacaine 15 ml and dexmedetomidine-1 ml, i.e., 50 micrograms)- 30 patients and group-BF (0.25% bupivacaine 15 ml and fentanyl-1 ml, i.e., 50 micrograms)-30 patients and compared. Results: There was a statistically significant difference (p<0.0001) in the mean length of sensory block, motor block, and mean time commencement of sensory block between the two groups. Conclusion: The study concludes that dexmedetomidine, when used as an adjuvant to epidural bupivacaine, exhibits a quick start of sensory block, a shorter time to reach maximal sensory level, a longer duration of analgesia, and a longer duration of motor blockade than fentanyl.

International Journal of Pharmaceutical Quality Assurance
Openalex Percentile: Top 61%
Anesthesia and Pain Management
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.