Ensuring Admissibility of Electronic Evidence in Criminal Proceedings

The paper substantiates the need to clarify existing definitions of "electronic evidence" in criminal procedure science. Content analysis of scholarly literature reveals types and classifications of admissibility criteria for electronic evidence. Through a systematic analysis of criminal procedure legislation, legal positions of the Supreme Court of the Russian Federation, a study of criminal procedure practice, an empirical study conducted by the author in 2024-2025 in 12 constituent entities of the Russian Federation, and foreign experience in using electronic evidence in criminal procedure proving, additional criteria for the admissibility of electronic criminal procedure evidence have been updated based on their digital origin and scope of existence. The author proposes a definition of electronic evidence in criminal proceedings, and systematizes the criteria for its admissibility in order to optimize criminal procedural practice.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Actual Problems of Russian Law
Published
2025-09-04
DOI
https://doi.org/10.17803/1994-1471.2025.177.8.124-132
Primary Topic
Digital and Cyber Forensics
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Ensuring Admissibility of Electronic Evidence in Criminal Proceedings

V. V. Platonov
Actual Problems of Russian Law
Digital and Cyber Forensics
article

Ensuring Admissibility of Electronic Evidence in Criminal Proceedings

V. V. Platonov
article en

Abstract

The paper substantiates the need to clarify existing definitions of "electronic evidence" in criminal procedure science. Content analysis of scholarly literature reveals types and classifications of admissibility criteria for electronic evidence. Through a systematic analysis of criminal procedure legislation, legal positions of the Supreme Court of the Russian Federation, a study of criminal procedure practice, an empirical study conducted by the author in 2024-2025 in 12 constituent entities of the Russian Federation, and foreign experience in using electronic evidence in criminal procedure proving, additional criteria for the admissibility of electronic criminal procedure evidence have been updated based on their digital origin and scope of existence. The author proposes a definition of electronic evidence in criminal proceedings, and systematizes the criteria for its admissibility in order to optimize criminal procedural practice.

Actual Problems of Russian LawVol. 20(8)
Kutafin Moscow State Law University (RU)
Openalex Percentile: Top 64%
Digital and Cyber Forensics
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.