Legal Nature of Online Arbitration and Its Relationship with Traditional Arbitration

The paper attempts to define the legal nature of online arbitration and its relationship with traditional arbitration. It questions whether online arbitration constitutes arbitration by its legal nature or represents dispute resolution procedures lacking arbitration characteristics. The conducted analysis shows that classifying nonarbitral procedures as “online arbitration” is unjustified from legal-technical and formal-logical perspectives; only procedures meeting core arbitration features qualify. The paper examines the problem of distinguishing online arbitration from traditional arbitration. Through instrumental and qualitative approaches to the role of digital technologies, it is noted that deep digital integration qualitatively transforms dispute resolution in online arbitration, creating phenomena absent in traditional arbitration. These phenomena change the nature of arbitration proceedings and serve as a distinctive feature that allows us to distinguish between online arbitration and traditional arbitration.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Actual Problems of Russian Law
Published
2025-09-04
DOI
https://doi.org/10.17803/1994-1471.2025.177.8.147-154
Primary Topic
Digital Transformation in Law
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Legal Nature of Online Arbitration and Its Relationship with Traditional Arbitration

Anastasiya Bocharova
Actual Problems of Russian Law
Digital Transformation in Law
article

Legal Nature of Online Arbitration and Its Relationship with Traditional Arbitration

Anastasiya Bocharova
article en

Abstract

The paper attempts to define the legal nature of online arbitration and its relationship with traditional arbitration. It questions whether online arbitration constitutes arbitration by its legal nature or represents dispute resolution procedures lacking arbitration characteristics. The conducted analysis shows that classifying nonarbitral procedures as “online arbitration” is unjustified from legal-technical and formal-logical perspectives; only procedures meeting core arbitration features qualify. The paper examines the problem of distinguishing online arbitration from traditional arbitration. Through instrumental and qualitative approaches to the role of digital technologies, it is noted that deep digital integration qualitatively transforms dispute resolution in online arbitration, creating phenomena absent in traditional arbitration. These phenomena change the nature of arbitration proceedings and serve as a distinctive feature that allows us to distinguish between online arbitration and traditional arbitration.

Actual Problems of Russian LawVol. 20(8)
Kutafin Moscow State Law University (RU)
Openalex Percentile: Top 61%
Digital Transformation in Law
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.