Addressing barriers: randomized trial of effect of video education on colonoscopy preparation in Cantonese/Mandarin-speaking patients

<h2>Abstract</h2><h3>Background and Aims</h3> Asian Americans demonstrate lower colonoscopy screening rates than the general U.S. population, highlighting complex cultural and social barriers. We aim to compare the effect of a video-based instructional tool versus standard of care on bowel preparation quality and patient-related factors. <h3>Methods</h3> A randomized controlled trial enrolled Cantonese/Mandarin-speaking patients who underwent outpatient colonoscopies between July and November 2023. Participants (n = 132) were randomly assigned to 2 groups: 1 receiving standard preparation guidance and the other a link to a video educational tool. Primary outcome was Boston Bowel Preparation Scale (BBPS) with secondary outcomes including total procedure time, withdrawal time, patients' anxiety levels, and self-perception of preparation quality. <h3>Results</h3> Of 169 participants enrolled (81 video, 88 control), 31 were excluded because of cancellations, no-shows, or consent withdrawal, resulting in 66 per group. Eleven video group participants did not watch the video and were reassigned to the control group per protocol. Final analysis included 77 in the control group and 55 in the video group, with a 55.5% male composition, averaging 60 years. In the per-protocol analysis, the median BBPS was the same in both groups (<i>P</i> = .064). The mean (95% confidence interval) withdrawal times exhibited no significant difference (<i>P</i> = .74), with averages of 14.4 (12.2-16.7) and 14.8 (12.9-16.9) minutes for the control and video groups, respectively. However, there was a significant difference in patient perception of preparation quality (<i>P</i> = .05), with averages of 9 (8.1-9) and 9.5 (9.3-9.7) for the control and experimental groups, respectively. <h3>Conclusions</h3> Our study suggests that a video-based instructional tool improves Cantonese/Mandarin-speaking participants' perception of colonoscopy preparation quality. There was a trend toward improved BBPS in patients who watched the video, while total procedure and withdrawal times were comparable in both groups. Further research is needed to assess the impact of educational videos and other tools on bowel preparation in this patient population.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
iGIE
Published
2025-09-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.igie.2025.09.001
Primary Topic
Colorectal Cancer Screening and Detection
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Addressing barriers: randomized trial of effect of video education on colonoscopy preparation in Cantonese/Mandarin-speaking patients

Sonia Friedman, Saleh Alghsoon, Sushrut Jangi, Amanda Leung et al.
iGIE
Colorectal Cancer Screening and Detection
article

Addressing barriers: randomized trial of effect of video education on colonoscopy preparation in Cantonese/Mandarin-speaking patients

Sonia Friedman, Saleh Alghsoon, Sushrut Jangi, Amanda Leung, Bowei Deng
article en

Abstract

<h2>Abstract</h2><h3>Background and Aims</h3> Asian Americans demonstrate lower colonoscopy screening rates than the general U.S. population, highlighting complex cultural and social barriers. We aim to compare the effect of a video-based instructional tool versus standard of care on bowel preparation quality and patient-related factors. <h3>Methods</h3> A randomized controlled trial enrolled Cantonese/Mandarin-speaking patients who underwent outpatient colonoscopies between July and November 2023. Participants (n = 132) were randomly assigned to 2 groups: 1 receiving standard preparation guidance and the other a link to a video educational tool. Primary outcome was Boston Bowel Preparation Scale (BBPS) with secondary outcomes including total procedure time, withdrawal time, patients' anxiety levels, and self-perception of preparation quality. <h3>Results</h3> Of 169 participants enrolled (81 video, 88 control), 31 were excluded because of cancellations, no-shows, or consent withdrawal, resulting in 66 per group. Eleven video group participants did not watch the video and were reassigned to the control group per protocol. Final analysis included 77 in the control group and 55 in the video group, with a 55.5% male composition, averaging 60 years. In the per-protocol analysis, the median BBPS was the same in both groups (<i>P</i> = .064). The mean (95% confidence interval) withdrawal times exhibited no significant difference (<i>P</i> = .74), with averages of 14.4 (12.2-16.7) and 14.8 (12.9-16.9) minutes for the control and video groups, respectively. However, there was a significant difference in patient perception of preparation quality (<i>P</i> = .05), with averages of 9 (8.1-9) and 9.5 (9.3-9.7) for the control and experimental groups, respectively. <h3>Conclusions</h3> Our study suggests that a video-based instructional tool improves Cantonese/Mandarin-speaking participants' perception of colonoscopy preparation quality. There was a trend toward improved BBPS in patients who watched the video, while total procedure and withdrawal times were comparable in both groups. Further research is needed to assess the impact of educational videos and other tools on bowel preparation in this patient population.

iGIE
Tufts University (US), Tufts Medical Center (US), Cleveland Clinic (US), King Saud bin Abdulaziz University for Health Sciences (SA), Cleveland Foundation (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 66%
Colorectal Cancer Screening and Detection
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.