Assessing Poverty Reduction Efforts in the European Union: A Novel Analytical Approach

ABSTRACT This article presents a framework supported by multi‐criteria decision‐making (MCDM) techniques to monitor and assess regional progress on SDG 1 (No Poverty) within European Union (EU) countries. The analysis is based on data from 27 EU member states covering the period 2018–2022. Missing data were addressed using the average predictions derived from five machine learning methods: linear models, neural networks, support vector machines, decision trees, and Gaussian process regression. The Simultaneous Evaluation of Criteria and Alternatives (SECA) method was employed to determine the objective weights of the criteria, while the Multi‐Criteria Ranking by Alternative Trace (MCRAT) method was used to compute country performance scores. The robustness of the results was validated through sensitivity analysis. The findings reveal significant disparities in poverty reduction performance across countries, with Cyprus, the Czech Republic, Finland, and others ranking highest, while Spain, Bulgaria, and Romania appear among the lowest performers. The study offers a flexible monitoring tool to support policymakers in aligning regional progress with the SDGs. The findings of the study provide comparative insights into the effectiveness of poverty reduction policies, offering strategic decision support for policymakers. Within this framework, it contributes to a more efficient allocation of resources in economic policies and the strengthening of regional cooperation.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Engineering Reports
Published
2025-09-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/eng2.70366
Primary Topic
Quality of Life Measurement
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Assessing Poverty Reduction Efforts in the European Union: A Novel Analytical Approach

Nazlı Ersoy, Shahryar Sorooshian, Mehmet Özçalıcı
Engineering Reports
Quality of Life Measurement
article

Assessing Poverty Reduction Efforts in the European Union: A Novel Analytical Approach

Nazlı Ersoy, Shahryar Sorooshian, Mehmet Özçalıcı
article en

Abstract

ABSTRACT This article presents a framework supported by multi‐criteria decision‐making (MCDM) techniques to monitor and assess regional progress on SDG 1 (No Poverty) within European Union (EU) countries. The analysis is based on data from 27 EU member states covering the period 2018–2022. Missing data were addressed using the average predictions derived from five machine learning methods: linear models, neural networks, support vector machines, decision trees, and Gaussian process regression. The Simultaneous Evaluation of Criteria and Alternatives (SECA) method was employed to determine the objective weights of the criteria, while the Multi‐Criteria Ranking by Alternative Trace (MCRAT) method was used to compute country performance scores. The robustness of the results was validated through sensitivity analysis. The findings reveal significant disparities in poverty reduction performance across countries, with Cyprus, the Czech Republic, Finland, and others ranking highest, while Spain, Bulgaria, and Romania appear among the lowest performers. The study offers a flexible monitoring tool to support policymakers in aligning regional progress with the SDGs. The findings of the study provide comparative insights into the effectiveness of poverty reduction policies, offering strategic decision support for policymakers. Within this framework, it contributes to a more efficient allocation of resources in economic policies and the strengthening of regional cooperation.

Engineering ReportsVol. 7(9)
Osmaniye Korkut Ata University (TR), Kilis 7 Aralık University (TR), University of Gothenburg (SE)
Openalex Percentile: Top 67%
Quality of Life Measurement
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.