Love and Essence: A Comparative Analysis of the Ideas of Plato and Abai

This article explores the philosophical continuity and differences between Plato’s concept of love and Abai’s concept of love. Despite most researchers being familiar with love in Turkic Islamic thought, few recognize the continuity between Plato’s concept of love and Abai. Plato emphasizes that love reveals the cause of Be-ing, affirming its truth and primacy. This aligns with the essence of Sufi love in Abai’s philosophy, where love for God is the foundation of all existence. Abai sees love as a realistic concept: each person shapes their own essence, while a general concept of essence defines the existence of all beings. In contrast, Plato views love as a singular conceptual term striving toward Abstract Beauty. Thus, we highlight not only the continuity but also key differences between Plato and Abai’s interpretations, reflected in the ontological stance of the former and the existential stance of the latter. It was concluded that for Abai, love characterize a personal ex-perience requiring individual engagement, whereas for Plato, love is the meaning of existence. The research also reveals Abai’s understanding of God’s Being through love for humanity, offering a new interpretation of love in his philosophy.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Bulletin of the Karaganda university History Philosophy series
Published
2025-06-30
DOI
https://doi.org/10.31489/2025hph2/273-284
Primary Topic
Islamic Studies and History
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Love and Essence: A Comparative Analysis of the Ideas of Plato and Abai

Asset Kuranbek, D.T. Kenzhetayev, Zhakhangir Nurmatov, K.R. Karatyshkanova et al.
Bulletin of the Karaganda university History Philosophy series
Islamic Studies and History
article

Love and Essence: A Comparative Analysis of the Ideas of Plato and Abai

Asset Kuranbek, D.T. Kenzhetayev, Zhakhangir Nurmatov, K.R. Karatyshkanova, Султанмурат Абжалов
article en

Abstract

This article explores the philosophical continuity and differences between Plato’s concept of love and Abai’s concept of love. Despite most researchers being familiar with love in Turkic Islamic thought, few recognize the continuity between Plato’s concept of love and Abai. Plato emphasizes that love reveals the cause of Be-ing, affirming its truth and primacy. This aligns with the essence of Sufi love in Abai’s philosophy, where love for God is the foundation of all existence. Abai sees love as a realistic concept: each person shapes their own essence, while a general concept of essence defines the existence of all beings. In contrast, Plato views love as a singular conceptual term striving toward Abstract Beauty. Thus, we highlight not only the continuity but also key differences between Plato and Abai’s interpretations, reflected in the ontological stance of the former and the existential stance of the latter. It was concluded that for Abai, love characterize a personal ex-perience requiring individual engagement, whereas for Plato, love is the meaning of existence. The research also reveals Abai’s understanding of God’s Being through love for humanity, offering a new interpretation of love in his philosophy.

Bulletin of the Karaganda university History Philosophy seriesVol. 118(2)
Openalex Percentile: Top 71%
Islamic Studies and History
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Love and Essence: A Comparative Analysis of the Ideas of Plato and Abai — Asset Kuranbek, D.T. Kenzhetayev, et al. · Bulletin of the Karaganda university History Philosophy series (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS