Locus of Hope as a Predictor of Political Engagement

Abstract Despite extensive literature on political participation, little is known about the role of motivational psychology. This study examines whether Locus of Hope (LoH), a personality characteristic that captures individual differences in strategies for goal attainment, is a predictor of political engagement. LoH theory considers both individual variations on self-assessed efficacy for goal attainment (high versus low efficacy) and whether efficacy is characterized by an internal (self-actualized) or external (inter-reliant) sense of agency. Using a novel measure of political goals, we examine the relationship between LoH and political engagement with a demographically representative sample of 784 Canadians. LoH and goal attainment were found to predict political engagement over and above measures of political efficacy and interest. The findings open new avenues of research that can help us better understand why and how some people engage in politics.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Canadian Journal of Political Science
Published
2025-09-09
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1017/s0008423925000228
Primary Topic
Social and Intergroup Psychology
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Locus of Hope as a Predictor of Political Engagement

Julie Aitken Schermer, Joanie Bouchard, Laura B. Stephenson, Jordan Mansell
Canadian Journal of Political Science
Social and Intergroup Psychology
article

Locus of Hope as a Predictor of Political Engagement

Julie Aitken Schermer, Joanie Bouchard, Laura B. Stephenson, Jordan Mansell
article en

Abstract

Abstract Despite extensive literature on political participation, little is known about the role of motivational psychology. This study examines whether Locus of Hope (LoH), a personality characteristic that captures individual differences in strategies for goal attainment, is a predictor of political engagement. LoH theory considers both individual variations on self-assessed efficacy for goal attainment (high versus low efficacy) and whether efficacy is characterized by an internal (self-actualized) or external (inter-reliant) sense of agency. Using a novel measure of political goals, we examine the relationship between LoH and political engagement with a demographically representative sample of 784 Canadians. LoH and goal attainment were found to predict political engagement over and above measures of political efficacy and interest. The findings open new avenues of research that can help us better understand why and how some people engage in politics.

Canadian Journal of Political ScienceVol. 59(1)
Western University (CA), Université de Sherbrooke (CA), McMaster University (CA)
Openalex Percentile: Top 67%
Social and Intergroup Psychology
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Locus of Hope as a Predictor of Political Engagement — Julie Aitken Schermer, Joanie Bouchard, et al. · Canadian Journal of Political Science (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS