Awareness and knowledge of impression techniques for cleft lip and palate among dentists: A cross-sectional survey

Management of cleft lip and palate (CLP) requires precise impression techniques, yet the awareness and application of these methods among general dental practitioners in India remain underexplored. In this cross-sectional survey of 380 dentists using a validated 18-item questionnaire, 64% were familiar with conventional approaches, but only 20% knew of digital techniques. Urban practitioners showed significantly higher knowledge scores than rural counterparts (72 ± 9 vs. 61 ± 11; p<0.01), while just 30% felt confident using digital methods. Lack of training (70%) and limited access to equipment (58%) were the main barriers and only half recognized procedural risks such as compromised neonatal nasal breathing. These findings reveal substantial knowledge gaps, underscoring the need for targeted educational initiatives to enhance CLP management skills.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Bioinformation
Published
2025-08-31
DOI
https://doi.org/10.6026/973206300212518
Primary Topic
Cleft Lip and Palate Research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Awareness and knowledge of impression techniques for cleft lip and palate among dentists: A cross-sectional survey

H S, Tejosmita Chowdary Pavuluri, G. Siva Prasad Reddy, Naseemoon Shaik et al.
Bioinformation
Cleft Lip and Palate Research
article

Awareness and knowledge of impression techniques for cleft lip and palate among dentists: A cross-sectional survey

H S, Tejosmita Chowdary Pavuluri, G. Siva Prasad Reddy, Naseemoon Shaik, D Vidhyadhar, Vivek Anne, Vivek Buddha
article en

Abstract

Management of cleft lip and palate (CLP) requires precise impression techniques, yet the awareness and application of these methods among general dental practitioners in India remain underexplored. In this cross-sectional survey of 380 dentists using a validated 18-item questionnaire, 64% were familiar with conventional approaches, but only 20% knew of digital techniques. Urban practitioners showed significantly higher knowledge scores than rural counterparts (72 ± 9 vs. 61 ± 11; p<0.01), while just 30% felt confident using digital methods. Lack of training (70%) and limited access to equipment (58%) were the main barriers and only half recognized procedural risks such as compromised neonatal nasal breathing. These findings reveal substantial knowledge gaps, underscoring the need for targeted educational initiatives to enhance CLP management skills.

BioinformationVol. 21(08)
Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey (US), University of Wyoming (US), Kamdhenu University (IN), National Institute of Dental and Craniofacial Research (US), MNR Dental College and Hospital (IN), Kamineni Institute of Dental Sciences (IN)
Openalex Percentile: Top 74%
Cleft Lip and Palate Research
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Awareness and knowledge of impression techniques for cleft lip and palate among dentists: A cross-sectional survey — H S, Tejosmita Chowdary Pavuluri, et al. · Bioinformation (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS