Corporate modern slavery and worker rights reporting: What does corporate board? Evidence from emerging economy

Purpose This study investigates the prevalence of corporate reporting on modern slavery and worker rights reporting (MSWRR) within the context of countries facing an elevated risk of modern slavery. Furthermore, it explores the impact of corporate governance mechanisms on enhancing MSWRR practices in such high-risk environments. Design/methodology/approach Grounded in stakeholder theory, we employed a sample comprising 300 firm-year observations from the textile industries of three South Asian countries (India, Pakistan and Bangladesh). The robustness of our findings, validated through a two-step system generalized method of moments (GMM), substantiates the significant contribution of this study to the corporate governance and MSWRR literature in developing economies. Findings The findings reveal a notably limited extent of modern slavery disclosure (MSD). Our results indicate a positive and statistically significant association between MSWRR and corporate governance elements such as directors engaged in social issues, directors with political connections and the presence of an audit committee. Conversely, a board with a concentrated family ownership structure is found to exert a significant negative influence on MSWRR. Originality/value In light of the imperative nature of the subject matter, a dearth of scholarly inquiry is evident within the corporate domain pertaining to contemporary slavery and the reporting of worker rights. Addressing this gap, our study underscores the role of stakeholder pressures in fostering improvements in corporate governance mechanisms, thereby strengthening corporate initiatives aimed at mitigating modern slavery risks and promoting worker rights.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Asian Review of Accounting
Published
2025-09-09
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1108/ara-01-2025-0023
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Corporate Social Responsibility Reporting
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
2.23
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Corporate modern slavery and worker rights reporting: What does corporate board? Evidence from emerging economy

Shamsun Nahar, Mosammet Asma Jahan, Sohel Mehedi, Md. Arifur Rahman et al.
1 citations
Asian Review of Accounting
Corporate Social Responsibility Reporting
2.23
article

Corporate modern slavery and worker rights reporting: What does corporate board? Evidence from emerging economy

Shamsun Nahar, Mosammet Asma Jahan, Sohel Mehedi, Md. Arifur Rahman, M S Hossain
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Purpose This study investigates the prevalence of corporate reporting on modern slavery and worker rights reporting (MSWRR) within the context of countries facing an elevated risk of modern slavery. Furthermore, it explores the impact of corporate governance mechanisms on enhancing MSWRR practices in such high-risk environments. Design/methodology/approach Grounded in stakeholder theory, we employed a sample comprising 300 firm-year observations from the textile industries of three South Asian countries (India, Pakistan and Bangladesh). The robustness of our findings, validated through a two-step system generalized method of moments (GMM), substantiates the significant contribution of this study to the corporate governance and MSWRR literature in developing economies. Findings The findings reveal a notably limited extent of modern slavery disclosure (MSD). Our results indicate a positive and statistically significant association between MSWRR and corporate governance elements such as directors engaged in social issues, directors with political connections and the presence of an audit committee. Conversely, a board with a concentrated family ownership structure is found to exert a significant negative influence on MSWRR. Originality/value In light of the imperative nature of the subject matter, a dearth of scholarly inquiry is evident within the corporate domain pertaining to contemporary slavery and the reporting of worker rights. Addressing this gap, our study underscores the role of stakeholder pressures in fostering improvements in corporate governance mechanisms, thereby strengthening corporate initiatives aimed at mitigating modern slavery risks and promoting worker rights.

Asian Review of AccountingVol. 34(2)
Griffith University (AU), Bond University (AU), University of Dhaka (BD), College of Accounting (SI), Open Polytechnic (NZ), Australian Catholic University (AU), University of Rajshahi (BD)
Openalex Percentile: Top 9%
Corporate Social Responsibility Reporting
2.23
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.