Healthcare Utilization and Complications Associated With Single-Use Versus Reusable Flexible Cystoscopy in Hospital Outpatient Settings

Purpose Cystoscopy is one of the most commonly performed urologic procedures in the United States, yet comparative outcome data for single-use versus reusable flexible cystoscopes in hospital outpatient settings are limited. This study compared 30‑day healthcare utilization and complications after single-use versus reusable flexible cystoscopy performed in hospital outpatient settings. Methods We performed a retrospective cohort study using the Premier PINC AI Healthcare Database to identify adults who underwent diagnostic cystoscopy in a hospital outpatient setting between January 1, 2022, and August 31, 2024. We compared outcomes of patients who underwent single-use versus reusable flexible cystoscopy. Primary outcomes were 30-day healthcare utilization and complications. Propensity score matching was used to control for demographics, comorbidities, clinical history, and prior healthcare utilization. A predefined subgroup analysis was performed for patients aged 65 years or older. Results Of 62,965 eligible encounters, 1,473 (2.3%) used single-use cystoscopes and 61,492 (97.7%) used reusable cystoscopes. After matching (1:5), 1,473 single-use procedures were compared with 7,365 reusable procedures. Thirty-day healthcare utilization was significantly lower with single-use devices (5.2% vs. 13.0%; hazard ratio (HR)=0.39; 95% confidence interval (95% CI): 0.31, 0.49; p<0.001). The results favored single-use cystoscopes for acute care events (p<0.001), emergency department visits (p=0.03), same-day surgeries (p=0.01), and clinic visits (p<0.001). Complication rates were significantly lower with single-use cystoscopes (1.8% vs. 4.3%; HR=0.40; 95% CI: 0.27, 0.60; p<0.001), as were serious complications (HR=0.63, 95% CI: 0.50, 0.81; p<0.001). The findings were similar in patients aged ≥65 years. Conclusion In hospital outpatient settings, single-use flexible cystoscopes were associated with substantially lower healthcare utilization and complication rates than reusable devices. These results support considering single-use cystoscopes when planning care pathways in hospital-based outpatient care.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Cureus
Published
2025-09-09
DOI
https://doi.org/10.7759/cureus.91879
Primary Topic
Kidney Stones and Urolithiasis Treatments
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Healthcare Utilization and Complications Associated With Single-Use Versus Reusable Flexible Cystoscopy in Hospital Outpatient Settings

Yongtae Shin, Sirikan Rojanasarot, Connor Forbes, Ben H. Chew et al.
1 links
Cureus
Kidney Stones and Urolithiasis Treatments
article

Healthcare Utilization and Complications Associated With Single-Use Versus Reusable Flexible Cystoscopy in Hospital Outpatient Settings

Yongtae Shin, Sirikan Rojanasarot, Connor Forbes, Ben H. Chew, Larry E. Miller, Theodore Tsacogianis, John White, K. Morris
article en

Abstract

Purpose Cystoscopy is one of the most commonly performed urologic procedures in the United States, yet comparative outcome data for single-use versus reusable flexible cystoscopes in hospital outpatient settings are limited. This study compared 30‑day healthcare utilization and complications after single-use versus reusable flexible cystoscopy performed in hospital outpatient settings. Methods We performed a retrospective cohort study using the Premier PINC AI Healthcare Database to identify adults who underwent diagnostic cystoscopy in a hospital outpatient setting between January 1, 2022, and August 31, 2024. We compared outcomes of patients who underwent single-use versus reusable flexible cystoscopy. Primary outcomes were 30-day healthcare utilization and complications. Propensity score matching was used to control for demographics, comorbidities, clinical history, and prior healthcare utilization. A predefined subgroup analysis was performed for patients aged 65 years or older. Results Of 62,965 eligible encounters, 1,473 (2.3%) used single-use cystoscopes and 61,492 (97.7%) used reusable cystoscopes. After matching (1:5), 1,473 single-use procedures were compared with 7,365 reusable procedures. Thirty-day healthcare utilization was significantly lower with single-use devices (5.2% vs. 13.0%; hazard ratio (HR)=0.39; 95% confidence interval (95% CI): 0.31, 0.49; p<0.001). The results favored single-use cystoscopes for acute care events (p<0.001), emergency department visits (p=0.03), same-day surgeries (p=0.01), and clinic visits (p<0.001). Complication rates were significantly lower with single-use cystoscopes (1.8% vs. 4.3%; HR=0.40; 95% CI: 0.27, 0.60; p<0.001), as were serious complications (HR=0.63, 95% CI: 0.50, 0.81; p<0.001). The findings were similar in patients aged ≥65 years. Conclusion In hospital outpatient settings, single-use flexible cystoscopes were associated with substantially lower healthcare utilization and complication rates than reusable devices. These results support considering single-use cystoscopes when planning care pathways in hospital-based outpatient care.

CureusVol. 17(9)
Johnson & Johnson (United States) (US), University of British Columbia (CA), Boston Scientific (United States) (US), Canadian Association of Nurses in Oncology (CA)
Openalex Percentile: Top 65%
Kidney Stones and Urolithiasis Treatments
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.