Evaluation of the pencak silat coaching program in East Java: A study using the CIPP model

This study evaluated the development of pencak silat coaching in East Java using Stufflebeam’s Context, Input, Process, Product (CIPP) evaluation model. The participants were 55 members of the East Java Indonesian Pencak Silat Association (IPSI), consisting of 11 coaches, 7 staff members, and 37 athletes. A mixed-method evaluative approach was employed, with data collected through questionnaires, observations, interviews, and document analysis. The results indicated that, overall, the implementation of the coaching program falls into the “good” category, with the following scores: (1) Context obtained an average score of 3.34, showing strong alignment between the program and government goals and policies; (2) Input received an average score of 2.84, categorized as “sufficient,” highlighting areas for improvement such as funding and infrastructure; (3) Process scored 3.16, rated as “good,” reflecting that the program was generally well-planned and executed as designed; and (4) Product achieved an average score of 3.18, also rated as “good,” indicating improvements in athletes’ physical and non-physical skills, despite a decline in medal counts during the 21st National Sports Week. In summary, the CIPP model was able to pinpoint the areas requiring improvement to foster greater success in pencak silat coaching development.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
SPORT TK-Revista EuroAmericana de Ciencias del Deporte
Published
2025-09-08
DOI
https://doi.org/10.6018/sportk.678531
Primary Topic
Sports and Physical Education Research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Evaluation of the pencak silat coaching program in East Java: A study using the CIPP model

Dhananjaya Sutanto, Achmad Widodo, Shidqi Hamdi Pratama Putera, Mokhamad Nur Bawono et al.
SPORT TK-Revista EuroAmericana de Ciencias del Deporte
Sports and Physical Education Research
article

Evaluation of the pencak silat coaching program in East Java: A study using the CIPP model

Dhananjaya Sutanto, Achmad Widodo, Shidqi Hamdi Pratama Putera, Mokhamad Nur Bawono, Anindya Mar’atus Sholikhah, Himawan Wismanadi, Heri Wahyudi, Roy Januardi Irawan
article en

Abstract

This study evaluated the development of pencak silat coaching in East Java using Stufflebeam’s Context, Input, Process, Product (CIPP) evaluation model. The participants were 55 members of the East Java Indonesian Pencak Silat Association (IPSI), consisting of 11 coaches, 7 staff members, and 37 athletes. A mixed-method evaluative approach was employed, with data collected through questionnaires, observations, interviews, and document analysis. The results indicated that, overall, the implementation of the coaching program falls into the “good” category, with the following scores: (1) Context obtained an average score of 3.34, showing strong alignment between the program and government goals and policies; (2) Input received an average score of 2.84, categorized as “sufficient,” highlighting areas for improvement such as funding and infrastructure; (3) Process scored 3.16, rated as “good,” reflecting that the program was generally well-planned and executed as designed; and (4) Product achieved an average score of 3.18, also rated as “good,” indicating improvements in athletes’ physical and non-physical skills, despite a decline in medal counts during the 21st National Sports Week. In summary, the CIPP model was able to pinpoint the areas requiring improvement to foster greater success in pencak silat coaching development.

SPORT TK-Revista EuroAmericana de Ciencias del DeporteVol. 14
State University of Semarang (ID), Chinese University of Hong Kong (HK), Universitas Negeri Surabaya (ID)
Openalex Percentile: Top 61%
Sports and Physical Education Research
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.