Assessment of bite pressure differences between implant-supported prostheses and natural dentition

A comparative analysis of the bite pressure between the mandibular first molars region using implant-supported prostheses and the contralateral side natural teeth is of interest. NUPAI and T-Scan III systems were used in the assessment of thirty-five patients. Data shows that maximum (34.2 vs 28.7 MPa) and average bite pressures (25.8 vs 21.4 MPa) and their contact areas (28.4 vs 24.1 mm 2) were noticeably greater on the natural tooth side (p < 0.05). The males showed an 18 percent higher bite power and differences were observed with age. Thus, natural teeth are better than implants because of proprioceptive feedback, which justifies the importance of appropriate adjustment of occlusion in implant prosthodontics.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Bioinformation
Published
2025-08-31
DOI
https://doi.org/10.6026/973206300212581
Primary Topic
Temporomandibular Joint Disorders
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Assessment of bite pressure differences between implant-supported prostheses and natural dentition

Deesha Chhaya, Subhajeet Dey, Rahul Shetty, Shikha Devi et al.
Bioinformation
Temporomandibular Joint Disorders
article

Assessment of bite pressure differences between implant-supported prostheses and natural dentition

Deesha Chhaya, Subhajeet Dey, Rahul Shetty, Shikha Devi, Mandeep Sharma, Soumya Iranna Dudhani, Miral Mehta
article en

Abstract

A comparative analysis of the bite pressure between the mandibular first molars region using implant-supported prostheses and the contralateral side natural teeth is of interest. NUPAI and T-Scan III systems were used in the assessment of thirty-five patients. Data shows that maximum (34.2 vs 28.7 MPa) and average bite pressures (25.8 vs 21.4 MPa) and their contact areas (28.4 vs 24.1 mm 2) were noticeably greater on the natural tooth side (p < 0.05). The males showed an 18 percent higher bite power and differences were observed with age. Thus, natural teeth are better than implants because of proprioceptive feedback, which justifies the importance of appropriate adjustment of occlusion in implant prosthodontics.

BioinformationVol. 21(08)
Sant Gadge Baba Amravati University (IN), Karnavati University
Openalex Percentile: Top 71%
Temporomandibular Joint Disorders
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Assessment of bite pressure differences between implant-supported prostheses and natural dentition — Deesha Chhaya, Subhajeet Dey, et al. · Bioinformation (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS