A lack of open data standards for large infrastructure projects hampers social-ecological research in the Brazilian Amazon

New infrastructure projects are planned or under construction in several countries, including in the bioculturally diverse Amazon, Mekong, and Congo regions. While infrastructure development can improve human health and living standards, it may also lead to environmental degradation, such as deforestation, and social change, such as loss of livelihoods. Accessible, high-quality data about infrastructure projects is essential for both monitoring these projects and studying their social and environmental impacts. As a case study, we investigated the availability and quality of data on infrastructure projects in the Brazilian Amazon by reviewing the academic literature and surveying researchers from the conservation and development community. We used the results of these surveys to identify recommended steps for the gathering, organizing, and sharing of infrastructure data by social-ecological researchers and practitioners. Although data on infrastructure in the Brazilian Amazon were generally available, they were often of poor quality and lacked information critical for monitoring and research. Data were often difficult to find on government and non-government websites as well as reformat, resulting in loss of time and resources for researchers and other stakeholders. Discrepancies between researchers' survey responses on data needs and the types of data used in peer-reviewed articles on infrastructure projects indicate the following information was often missing: geographic extent of the project, construction and operation dates, and project type (<i>e.g</i>., paved <i>vs</i>. unpaved road). Including these data in a standardized format, along with making them more readily accessible by hosting them in public repositories and ensuring they are current and comprehensive, would facilitate research and improve planning, decision-making, and monitoring of operational and planned infrastructure projects in Brazil and other developing countries.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
PeerJ
Published
2025-09-09
DOI
https://doi.org/10.7717/peerj.19926
Primary Topic
Data Quality and Management
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

A lack of open data standards for large infrastructure projects hampers social-ecological research in the Brazilian Amazon

Simone Athayde, Stephanie Bohlman, Emilio M. Bruna, Christine Swanson et al.
PeerJ
Data Quality and Management
article

A lack of open data standards for large infrastructure projects hampers social-ecological research in the Brazilian Amazon

Simone Athayde, Stephanie Bohlman, Emilio M. Bruna, Christine Swanson, Jacy Hyde, Denis Valle
article en

Abstract

New infrastructure projects are planned or under construction in several countries, including in the bioculturally diverse Amazon, Mekong, and Congo regions. While infrastructure development can improve human health and living standards, it may also lead to environmental degradation, such as deforestation, and social change, such as loss of livelihoods. Accessible, high-quality data about infrastructure projects is essential for both monitoring these projects and studying their social and environmental impacts. As a case study, we investigated the availability and quality of data on infrastructure projects in the Brazilian Amazon by reviewing the academic literature and surveying researchers from the conservation and development community. We used the results of these surveys to identify recommended steps for the gathering, organizing, and sharing of infrastructure data by social-ecological researchers and practitioners. Although data on infrastructure in the Brazilian Amazon were generally available, they were often of poor quality and lacked information critical for monitoring and research. Data were often difficult to find on government and non-government websites as well as reformat, resulting in loss of time and resources for researchers and other stakeholders. Discrepancies between researchers' survey responses on data needs and the types of data used in peer-reviewed articles on infrastructure projects indicate the following information was often missing: geographic extent of the project, construction and operation dates, and project type (<i>e.g</i>., paved <i>vs</i>. unpaved road). Including these data in a standardized format, along with making them more readily accessible by hosting them in public repositories and ensuring they are current and comprehensive, would facilitate research and improve planning, decision-making, and monitoring of operational and planned infrastructure projects in Brazil and other developing countries.

PeerJVol. 13
Smithsonian Tropical Research Institute (PA), U.S. National Science Foundation (US), World Resources Institute (US), University of Florida (US), Division of Undergraduate Education (US)
National Science Foundation, National Aeronautics and Space Administration, U.S. Department of Agriculture, Nuclear Safety and Security Commission, Agência Nacional de Energia Elétrica, National Institute of Food and Agriculture, Office of Naval Research, U.S. Naval Research Laboratory
Openalex Percentile: Top 71%
Data Quality and Management
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.