009 Frequency of low-value cancer screening: a nationwide population-based study

<h3>Objectives</h3> Cancer screening is only recommended when the benefits of a screening test outweigh its harms at a reasonable cost. Evidence-based guideline recommendations produced by independent expert bodies are an important decision-making tool that should guide cancer screening practices. Screening outside of these recommendations is a form of low-value care that can lead to unnecessary harm including overdiagnosis. Our goal was to estimate the frequency of colorectal, breast, cervical, and prostate cancer screening outside of the recommended age guidelines in Switzerland. <h3>Method</h3> We undertook a secondary data analysis of the 2022 Swiss Health Survey, a random-sampled nationwide population-based cross-sectional survey of 21,930 (36.2% participation rate) Swiss residents aged 15 years and above. Survey participants underwent telephone interviews where they self-reported cancer screening use for breast, cervical, colorectal, and prostate cancer. Participants indicated whether they had undergone specified screening tests and, if they had, the reason (preventive or other) and timing of their most recent corresponding test. We calculated participants’ age at screening and classified participants as either having not undergone screening, undergone screening within United States Preventive Service Taskforce (USPSTF) A, B, and C grade and A and B grade recommendations, or undergone screening outside these recommendations, respectively. <h3>Results</h3> Cancer screening outside of USPSTF A, B, and C recommendations was observed among 40.2% of older adults 75 years old or more (75+), with a higher proportion among women (44.5%) than men (35.1%) within this age group. The proportion of adults aged 75+ who have been screened outside of A and B recommendations was 50.4% (women: 50.2%; men: 50.5%). Among adults aged 40–59, the proportions screened outside of A, B, and C recommendations were 12.3% and 20.9% for A and B recommendations. Among women aged 20–39 years, screening outside of recommendations was observed at 9.9% for both A, B, and C and A and B recommendations. Cervical and prostate cancer screening were the most frequently used outside of A, B, and C recommendations among adults aged 75+ (37.1% of women; 34.0% of men). <h3>Conclusions</h3> Cancer screening outside of evidence-based recommendations is highly common, especially among older adults. These low-value screening practices likely contribute to high rates of overdiagnosis and overtreatment of inconsequential cancers. Interventions aimed at de-implementing and deterring this form of low-value care urgently need to be developed to prevent overdiagnosis.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Published
2025-09-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1136/ebm-2025-pod.9
Primary Topic
Biomedical Ethics and Regulation
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

009 Frequency of low-value cancer screening: a nationwide population-based study

Nicolas Rodondi, F. Smit, Arnaud Chioléro, Vladimir Jolidon et al.
Biomedical Ethics and Regulation
article

009 Frequency of low-value cancer screening: a nationwide population-based study

Nicolas Rodondi, F. Smit, Arnaud Chioléro, Vladimir Jolidon, Stéphane Cullati, B. van der Linden
article en

Abstract

<h3>Objectives</h3> Cancer screening is only recommended when the benefits of a screening test outweigh its harms at a reasonable cost. Evidence-based guideline recommendations produced by independent expert bodies are an important decision-making tool that should guide cancer screening practices. Screening outside of these recommendations is a form of low-value care that can lead to unnecessary harm including overdiagnosis. Our goal was to estimate the frequency of colorectal, breast, cervical, and prostate cancer screening outside of the recommended age guidelines in Switzerland. <h3>Method</h3> We undertook a secondary data analysis of the 2022 Swiss Health Survey, a random-sampled nationwide population-based cross-sectional survey of 21,930 (36.2% participation rate) Swiss residents aged 15 years and above. Survey participants underwent telephone interviews where they self-reported cancer screening use for breast, cervical, colorectal, and prostate cancer. Participants indicated whether they had undergone specified screening tests and, if they had, the reason (preventive or other) and timing of their most recent corresponding test. We calculated participants’ age at screening and classified participants as either having not undergone screening, undergone screening within United States Preventive Service Taskforce (USPSTF) A, B, and C grade and A and B grade recommendations, or undergone screening outside these recommendations, respectively. <h3>Results</h3> Cancer screening outside of USPSTF A, B, and C recommendations was observed among 40.2% of older adults 75 years old or more (75+), with a higher proportion among women (44.5%) than men (35.1%) within this age group. The proportion of adults aged 75+ who have been screened outside of A and B recommendations was 50.4% (women: 50.2%; men: 50.5%). Among adults aged 40–59, the proportions screened outside of A, B, and C recommendations were 12.3% and 20.9% for A and B recommendations. Among women aged 20–39 years, screening outside of recommendations was observed at 9.9% for both A, B, and C and A and B recommendations. Cervical and prostate cancer screening were the most frequently used outside of A, B, and C recommendations among adults aged 75+ (37.1% of women; 34.0% of men). <h3>Conclusions</h3> Cancer screening outside of evidence-based recommendations is highly common, especially among older adults. These low-value screening practices likely contribute to high rates of overdiagnosis and overtreatment of inconsequential cancers. Interventions aimed at de-implementing and deterring this form of low-value care urgently need to be developed to prevent overdiagnosis.

University of Bern (CH), University of Fribourg (CH), University Hospital of Bern (CH), Swiss School of Public Health (CH), Zurich University of Teacher Education (CH), McGill University (CA)
Openalex Percentile: Top 69%
Biomedical Ethics and Regulation
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.