Analysis of microgap for root canal filling material filled with a hydrophilic and hydrophobic obturating system

The microgap formation associated with hydrophilic and hydrophobic root canal obturation systems is of interest. Hence, thirty extracted human single-rooted teeth were randomly divided into two groups (n=15 each): Group I - obturated (Resilon with Epiphany sealer) and Group II - obturated hydrophobic system (Gutta-percha with AH Plus sealer). After obturation, the samples and microgaps were evaluated using scanning electron microscopy (SEM) at 2000x magnification. Group I (hydrophilic) showed a significantly lower mean microgap of 2.36 ± 0.52 µm, while Group II (hydrophobic) exhibited a higher mean microgap of 5.81 ± 0.89 µm. Thus, hydrophilic obturation systems showed superior sealing ability with minimal microgap formation compared to hydrophobic systems.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Bioinformation
Published
2025-08-31
DOI
https://doi.org/10.6026/973206300212586
Primary Topic
Endodontics and Root Canal Treatments
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Analysis of microgap for root canal filling material filled with a hydrophilic and hydrophobic obturating system

Mani Bhushan, Anushree Tiwari, Naman Vaidya, Soumyaranjan Nanda et al.
5 links
Bioinformation
Endodontics and Root Canal Treatments
article

Analysis of microgap for root canal filling material filled with a hydrophilic and hydrophobic obturating system

Mani Bhushan, Anushree Tiwari, Naman Vaidya, Soumyaranjan Nanda, Subasish Behera, Pallavi Mishra, Miral Mehta
article en

Abstract

The microgap formation associated with hydrophilic and hydrophobic root canal obturation systems is of interest. Hence, thirty extracted human single-rooted teeth were randomly divided into two groups (n=15 each): Group I - obturated (Resilon with Epiphany sealer) and Group II - obturated hydrophobic system (Gutta-percha with AH Plus sealer). After obturation, the samples and microgaps were evaluated using scanning electron microscopy (SEM) at 2000x magnification. Group I (hydrophilic) showed a significantly lower mean microgap of 2.36 ± 0.52 µm, while Group II (hydrophobic) exhibited a higher mean microgap of 5.81 ± 0.89 µm. Thus, hydrophilic obturation systems showed superior sealing ability with minimal microgap formation compared to hydrophobic systems.

BioinformationVol. 21(08)
Sant Gadge Baba Amravati University (IN), Paoli Hospital (US), Sri Sri University (IN), Government Dental College and Hospital (IN), National Law University Odisha (IN), Karnavati University, KIIT University (IN), Ragas Dental College & Hospital (IN)
Openalex Percentile: Top 66%
Endodontics and Root Canal Treatments
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Analysis of microgap for root canal filling material filled with a hydrophilic and hydrophobic obturating system — Mani Bhushan, Anushree Tiwari, et al. · Bioinformation (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS