Bee Body Size and Foraging Behavior Predict the Pollination Role of Bees in a Buzz‐Pollinated Plant Community

Buzz pollination has been studied for over a century, yet the drivers shaping plant-pollinator interactions at the community level remain poorly understood. Although previous research has identified key functional traits associated with sonication-foraging behavior and taxonomic relationships among floral visitors, the specific bee traits that promote effective pollination are still unclear. In this study, we investigated which morphological and behavioral characteristics of flower-visiting bees predict pollination success within a plant community containing multiple buzz-pollinated species. Focusing on eight co-occurring, co-flowering plant species with poricidal anthers, we measured stigma contact (as a proxy for pollination efficiency), visitation rates, flower and whole plant handling time, intertegular span (body size), and pollen extraction mode across different bee species. Our results showed that both morphological and behavioral traits can predict pollination success. Specifically, stigma contact was positively associated with larger body size, suggesting that larger bees are more likely to touch the stigma during visits. In contrast, longer flower and plant handling times were linked to a low likelihood of stigma contacts-traits more commonly observed in smaller bees. Bees that used floral sonication visited more flowers and plants per unit time and contacted stigmas approximately four times more frequently than non-sonicating bees. However, detailed aspects of sonication behavior-such as the number and duration of buzzes-were not associated with pollination efficiency. These findings suggest that while bees visiting buzz-pollinated flowers may share similar pollen extraction mechanisms, variation in physical and behavioral traits plays a crucial role in shaping pollination dynamics.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Ecology and Evolution
Published
2025-09-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/ece3.72150
Citations
3
Primary Topic
Plant and animal studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
9.08

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Bee Body Size and Foraging Behavior Predict the Pollination Role of Bees in a Buzz‐Pollinated Plant Community

Clemens Schlindwein, José Neiva Mesquita Neto
3 citations
Ecology and Evolution
Plant and animal studies
9.08
article

Bee Body Size and Foraging Behavior Predict the Pollination Role of Bees in a Buzz‐Pollinated Plant Community

Clemens Schlindwein, José Neiva Mesquita Neto
article en
3 citations

Abstract

Buzz pollination has been studied for over a century, yet the drivers shaping plant-pollinator interactions at the community level remain poorly understood. Although previous research has identified key functional traits associated with sonication-foraging behavior and taxonomic relationships among floral visitors, the specific bee traits that promote effective pollination are still unclear. In this study, we investigated which morphological and behavioral characteristics of flower-visiting bees predict pollination success within a plant community containing multiple buzz-pollinated species. Focusing on eight co-occurring, co-flowering plant species with poricidal anthers, we measured stigma contact (as a proxy for pollination efficiency), visitation rates, flower and whole plant handling time, intertegular span (body size), and pollen extraction mode across different bee species. Our results showed that both morphological and behavioral traits can predict pollination success. Specifically, stigma contact was positively associated with larger body size, suggesting that larger bees are more likely to touch the stigma during visits. In contrast, longer flower and plant handling times were linked to a low likelihood of stigma contacts-traits more commonly observed in smaller bees. Bees that used floral sonication visited more flowers and plants per unit time and contacted stigmas approximately four times more frequently than non-sonicating bees. However, detailed aspects of sonication behavior-such as the number and duration of buzzes-were not associated with pollination efficiency. These findings suggest that while bees visiting buzz-pollinated flowers may share similar pollen extraction mechanisms, variation in physical and behavioral traits plays a crucial role in shaping pollination dynamics.

Ecology and EvolutionVol. 15(9)
Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais (BR), Catholic University of the Maule (CL)
Rufford Foundation, Coordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível Superior, Universidade Federal de Uberlândia, Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico, Fundação de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado de Minas Gerais, Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais, Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro, Instituto Chico Mendes de Conservação da Biodiversidade
Openalex Percentile: Top 2%
Plant and animal studies
9.08
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.