Unsupervised Clustering of Optical Coherence Tomography Data in Patients with Leber Hereditary Optic Neuropathy using Non-Negative Matrix Factorization and K-Means: A Comparison

INTRODUCTION Leber Hereditary Optic Neuropathy (LHON) is a rare genetic neurodegenerative disorder of the optic nerve, caused by mitochondrial DNA (mtDNA) pathogenic variants. It leads to sudden and severe central vision loss, mostly bilateral, typically in young adult males (onset age 18–35), though cases from 2 to 87 year of disease onset have been reported [1]. LHON has incomplete penetrance: all family members may carry the causative mtDNA pathogenic variant, but only some develop the disease phenotype. No definite predictors of disease conversion exist. However, subclinical signs can be detected through Optical Coherence Tomography (OCT), which vary between LHON asymptomatic carriers and symptomatic patients [2,3,4]. OCT is a non-invasive imaging technique that measures the thickness of retinal layers and optic nerve fibers. We used the DRI OCT Triton (Topcon), a swept-source multimodal imaging OCT device. LHON asymptomatic carriers may show early retinal alterations, while symptomatic individuals in the acute phase (within 6 months from onset) present distinct OCT phenotypes. Identifying putative OCT parameters predicting clinical conversion is an urgent unmet clinical need. OBJECTIVES To apply unsupervised clustering techniques to OCT data to identify latent subgroups of eyes with similar structural patterns, and assess their coherence with known clinical classes. METHODS We analyzed 173 eyes from symptomatic LHON patients (acute phase), asymptomatic LHON carriers, and healthy controls, based on 41 OCT parameters related to Ganglion Cell Layer (GCL), Retinal Nerve Fiber Layer (RNFL), and choroidal thickness. Data were normalized and clustered using: (1) Non-negative Matrix Factorization (NMF) via Brunet and Lee methods, running 50 iterations with cluster number (k) optimization based on internal quality indices [5]; (2) K-means clustering with optimal k selected using Elbow and Gap statistics. We also constructed a complete ExpressionSet object including phenotypic and clinical metadata to facilitate integration and visualization [5]. RESULTS All methods identified an optimal partition into 3 clusters, broadly consistent with the clinical classification. Brunet-based NMF outperformed Lee-NMF in capturing the clinical structure (purity 0.601 vs 0.572; entropy 0.744 vs 0.784), likely due to its ability to model sparse data, such as OCT matrices where a few variables dominate the individual profiles. Then, the extracted metagenes (partitions) showed localized structural patterns in RNFL and GCL sectors. K-means also separated groups meaningfully, although with more overlap, especially among symptomatic eyes. CONCLUSIONS Among the clustering methods tested, Brunet-based NMF emerged as the most suitable for unsupervised stratification of LHON patients, carriers, and controls based on OCT data. Its advantage lies in the ability to highlight sparse but informative features — i.e., those OCT parameters that best discriminate between clinical groups — allowing for more distinct phenotypic clustering. These findings support the use of data-driven approaches for structural profiling and future development of predictive tools for LHON conversion.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Epidemiology Biostatistics and Public Health
Published
2025-09-08
DOI
https://doi.org/10.54103/2282-0930/29503
Primary Topic
Spectroscopy Techniques in Biomedical and Chemical Research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Unsupervised Clustering of Optical Coherence Tomography Data in Patients with Leber Hereditary Optic Neuropathy using Non-Negative Matrix Factorization and K-Means: A Comparison

Claudio Fiorini, Piero Barboni, Annarita Vestri, Martina Romagnoli et al.
Epidemiology Biostatistics and Public Health
Spectroscopy Techniques in Biomedical and Chemical Research
article

Unsupervised Clustering of Optical Coherence Tomography Data in Patients with Leber Hereditary Optic Neuropathy using Non-Negative Matrix Factorization and K-Means: A Comparison

Claudio Fiorini, Piero Barboni, Annarita Vestri, Martina Romagnoli, Chiara La Morgia, Michele Carbonelli, Luigi Palla, Valério Carelli, Giulia Amore, Victoria Lee Caporali
article en

Abstract

INTRODUCTION Leber Hereditary Optic Neuropathy (LHON) is a rare genetic neurodegenerative disorder of the optic nerve, caused by mitochondrial DNA (mtDNA) pathogenic variants. It leads to sudden and severe central vision loss, mostly bilateral, typically in young adult males (onset age 18–35), though cases from 2 to 87 year of disease onset have been reported [1]. LHON has incomplete penetrance: all family members may carry the causative mtDNA pathogenic variant, but only some develop the disease phenotype. No definite predictors of disease conversion exist. However, subclinical signs can be detected through Optical Coherence Tomography (OCT), which vary between LHON asymptomatic carriers and symptomatic patients [2,3,4]. OCT is a non-invasive imaging technique that measures the thickness of retinal layers and optic nerve fibers. We used the DRI OCT Triton (Topcon), a swept-source multimodal imaging OCT device. LHON asymptomatic carriers may show early retinal alterations, while symptomatic individuals in the acute phase (within 6 months from onset) present distinct OCT phenotypes. Identifying putative OCT parameters predicting clinical conversion is an urgent unmet clinical need. OBJECTIVES To apply unsupervised clustering techniques to OCT data to identify latent subgroups of eyes with similar structural patterns, and assess their coherence with known clinical classes. METHODS We analyzed 173 eyes from symptomatic LHON patients (acute phase), asymptomatic LHON carriers, and healthy controls, based on 41 OCT parameters related to Ganglion Cell Layer (GCL), Retinal Nerve Fiber Layer (RNFL), and choroidal thickness. Data were normalized and clustered using: (1) Non-negative Matrix Factorization (NMF) via Brunet and Lee methods, running 50 iterations with cluster number (k) optimization based on internal quality indices [5]; (2) K-means clustering with optimal k selected using Elbow and Gap statistics. We also constructed a complete ExpressionSet object including phenotypic and clinical metadata to facilitate integration and visualization [5]. RESULTS All methods identified an optimal partition into 3 clusters, broadly consistent with the clinical classification. Brunet-based NMF outperformed Lee-NMF in capturing the clinical structure (purity 0.601 vs 0.572; entropy 0.744 vs 0.784), likely due to its ability to model sparse data, such as OCT matrices where a few variables dominate the individual profiles. Then, the extracted metagenes (partitions) showed localized structural patterns in RNFL and GCL sectors. K-means also separated groups meaningfully, although with more overlap, especially among symptomatic eyes. CONCLUSIONS Among the clustering methods tested, Brunet-based NMF emerged as the most suitable for unsupervised stratification of LHON patients, carriers, and controls based on OCT data. Its advantage lies in the ability to highlight sparse but informative features — i.e., those OCT parameters that best discriminate between clinical groups — allowing for more distinct phenotypic clustering. These findings support the use of data-driven approaches for structural profiling and future development of predictive tools for LHON conversion.

Epidemiology Biostatistics and Public Health
Institute of Neurological Sciences (IT), Istituto delle Scienze Neurologiche di Bologna (IT), IRCCS Ospedale San Raffaele (IT), Department of Public Health (MM), Sapienza University of Rome (IT), University of Bologna (IT)
Openalex Percentile: Top 83%
Spectroscopy Techniques in Biomedical and Chemical Research
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.