Engineering MLOps Pipelines With Data Quality: A Case Study on Tabular Datasets in Kaggle

ABSTRACT Ensuring high‐quality data is crucial for the successful deployment of machine learning models, thereby sustaining the operational pipelines around such models. However, a significant number of practitioners do not currently use data quality checks or measurements as gateways for their model construction and operationalization, indicating a need for greater awareness and adoption of these tools. In this study, we propose an automated approach for automating the process of architecting machine learning pipelines by means of (semi‐)automated data quality checks. We focus on tabular data as a representative of the most widely used structured data formats in said pipelines. Our work is based on a subset of metrics that are particularly relevant in MLOps pipelines, stemming from our engagement with expert practitioners in machine learning operations (MLOps). We selected Deepchecks, a well‐known tool for conducting data quality checks, from a cohort of similar tools to evaluate the quality of datasets collected from Kaggle, a widely used platform for machine learning competitions and data science projects. We also analyze the main features used by Kaggle to rank their datasets and used these features to validate the relevance of our approach. Our approach shows the potential for automated data quality checks to improve the efficiency and effectiveness of MLOps pipelines and their operation, by decreasing the risk of introducing errors and biases into machine learning models in production.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Software Evolution and Process
Published
2025-09-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/smr.70044
Primary Topic
Machine Learning and Data Classification
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Engineering MLOps Pipelines With Data Quality: A Case Study on Tabular Datasets in Kaggle

Damian A. Tamburri, Giovanni Quattrocchi, Matteo Camilli, Matteo Pancini
Journal of Software Evolution and Process
Machine Learning and Data Classification
article

Engineering MLOps Pipelines With Data Quality: A Case Study on Tabular Datasets in Kaggle

Damian A. Tamburri, Giovanni Quattrocchi, Matteo Camilli, Matteo Pancini
article en

Abstract

ABSTRACT Ensuring high‐quality data is crucial for the successful deployment of machine learning models, thereby sustaining the operational pipelines around such models. However, a significant number of practitioners do not currently use data quality checks or measurements as gateways for their model construction and operationalization, indicating a need for greater awareness and adoption of these tools. In this study, we propose an automated approach for automating the process of architecting machine learning pipelines by means of (semi‐)automated data quality checks. We focus on tabular data as a representative of the most widely used structured data formats in said pipelines. Our work is based on a subset of metrics that are particularly relevant in MLOps pipelines, stemming from our engagement with expert practitioners in machine learning operations (MLOps). We selected Deepchecks, a well‐known tool for conducting data quality checks, from a cohort of similar tools to evaluate the quality of datasets collected from Kaggle, a widely used platform for machine learning competitions and data science projects. We also analyze the main features used by Kaggle to rank their datasets and used these features to validate the relevance of our approach. Our approach shows the potential for automated data quality checks to improve the efficiency and effectiveness of MLOps pipelines and their operation, by decreasing the risk of introducing errors and biases into machine learning models in production.

Journal of Software Evolution and ProcessVol. 37(9)
NXP (Netherlands) (NL), University of Sannio (IT), Politecnico di Milano (IT)
Openalex Percentile: Top 87%
Machine Learning and Data Classification
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.