Strengthening school–university partnerships using shared governance

Purpose This study aimed to explore how shared governance was enacted to strengthen a school–university residency partnership within a pre-service teacher education program at Texas A&M University-Corpus Christi (TAMU-CC), a Hispanic-Serving Institution (HSI). The program, supported by University-School Partnerships for the Renewal of Educator Preparation (US PREP), reflects a shift from traditional clinical experiences to a year-long residency model in partnership with Corpus Christi Independent School District (CCISD), a public school district serving over 30,000 PreK-12 students. Emphasizing transparency, trust and communication, the study drew on structured documentation and observations from four governance meetings during the 2023–2024 academic year. The research was guided by two overarching questions: (1) How was shared governance enacted in the development of a school-university residency partnership? and (2) In what ways did university, district and third-party stakeholders collaborate in decision-making across governance meetings? Design/methodology/approach This qualitative case study (Yin, 2014) analyzed data from four quarterly governance meetings where stakeholders collaborated, negotiated and shared responsibilities. Data were collected through meeting observations, minutes, notes and document analysis using constant comparison coding (Glaser and Strauss, 1967). The analysis was guided by the shared governance principles outlined by the US PREP. Findings Governance meetings facilitated inclusive decision-making, reduced hierarchical barriers and supported program sustainability and diversity. Key findings highlight the benefits and challenges of shared governance in residency models, including increased transparency, improved communication and collaborative problem-solving between school and university partners. Research limitations/implications As a single-case study, findings may not be generalizable to all contexts. Findings are context-specific and their transferability to other settings or residency models requires careful consideration. Practical implications This study offers insights for policymakers and educators seeking to strengthen school–university partnerships and enhance equity and inclusivity in teacher residency programs through shared governance structures. Originality/value This research advances the understanding of shared governance in teacher preparation programs, demonstrating its role in promoting equitable participation, collaborative decision-making and strengthened partnerships in diverse educational settings.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
School-University Partnerships
Published
2025-09-09
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1108/sup-03-2025-0009
Citations
2
Primary Topic
Collaborative Teaching and Inclusion
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
17.85
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Strengthening school–university partnerships using shared governance

Rizwan Shaikh, Kimberly S. Reinhardt
2 citations
School-University Partnerships
Collaborative Teaching and Inclusion
17.85
article

Strengthening school–university partnerships using shared governance

Rizwan Shaikh, Kimberly S. Reinhardt
article en
2 citations

Abstract

Purpose This study aimed to explore how shared governance was enacted to strengthen a school–university residency partnership within a pre-service teacher education program at Texas A&M University-Corpus Christi (TAMU-CC), a Hispanic-Serving Institution (HSI). The program, supported by University-School Partnerships for the Renewal of Educator Preparation (US PREP), reflects a shift from traditional clinical experiences to a year-long residency model in partnership with Corpus Christi Independent School District (CCISD), a public school district serving over 30,000 PreK-12 students. Emphasizing transparency, trust and communication, the study drew on structured documentation and observations from four governance meetings during the 2023–2024 academic year. The research was guided by two overarching questions: (1) How was shared governance enacted in the development of a school-university residency partnership? and (2) In what ways did university, district and third-party stakeholders collaborate in decision-making across governance meetings? Design/methodology/approach This qualitative case study (Yin, 2014) analyzed data from four quarterly governance meetings where stakeholders collaborated, negotiated and shared responsibilities. Data were collected through meeting observations, minutes, notes and document analysis using constant comparison coding (Glaser and Strauss, 1967). The analysis was guided by the shared governance principles outlined by the US PREP. Findings Governance meetings facilitated inclusive decision-making, reduced hierarchical barriers and supported program sustainability and diversity. Key findings highlight the benefits and challenges of shared governance in residency models, including increased transparency, improved communication and collaborative problem-solving between school and university partners. Research limitations/implications As a single-case study, findings may not be generalizable to all contexts. Findings are context-specific and their transferability to other settings or residency models requires careful consideration. Practical implications This study offers insights for policymakers and educators seeking to strengthen school–university partnerships and enhance equity and inclusivity in teacher residency programs through shared governance structures. Originality/value This research advances the understanding of shared governance in teacher preparation programs, demonstrating its role in promoting equitable participation, collaborative decision-making and strengthened partnerships in diverse educational settings.

School-University PartnershipsVol. 18(3)
Texas A&M University – Corpus Christi (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 1%
Collaborative Teaching and Inclusion
17.85
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.