Le pays kpankpamba, du pouvoir traditionnel à la chefferie administrative du XVIe siècle à 1936

This study analyzes the evolution of the sociopolitical organization of the Bikpakpaam from the 16th century to the 1930s. Based on a corpus of written (German and French administrations) and oral (2023–2024 surveys in Togo and Ghana), we describe the pre-colonial structure based on family (lidicaal), lineage (limaantɔl) and clan (linikeel), governed by the gerontocracy (Utindaan, Uniŋkpil, council of elders). We show how the colonial administration introduced chieftaincy (Tibɔtiir), reconfigured local authority and modified political, economic and sociocultural practices (collective work, cash crops, local justice). Finally, the article discusses the ambivalences of this institution: initially contested, it became a vector of change while giving rise to internal rivalries.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Uirtus
Published
2025-08-31
DOI
https://doi.org/10.59384/uirtus.2025.2980
Primary Topic
Agriculture and Rural Development Research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Le pays kpankpamba, du pouvoir traditionnel à la chefferie administrative du XVIe siècle à 1936

N’Nigmatoui Ouadja, Ilaboti Dipo
Uirtus
Agriculture and Rural Development Research
article

Le pays kpankpamba, du pouvoir traditionnel à la chefferie administrative du XVIe siècle à 1936

N’Nigmatoui Ouadja, Ilaboti Dipo
article en

Abstract

This study analyzes the evolution of the sociopolitical organization of the Bikpakpaam from the 16th century to the 1930s. Based on a corpus of written (German and French administrations) and oral (2023–2024 surveys in Togo and Ghana), we describe the pre-colonial structure based on family (lidicaal), lineage (limaantɔl) and clan (linikeel), governed by the gerontocracy (Utindaan, Uniŋkpil, council of elders). We show how the colonial administration introduced chieftaincy (Tibɔtiir), reconfigured local authority and modified political, economic and sociocultural practices (collective work, cash crops, local justice). Finally, the article discusses the ambivalences of this institution: initially contested, it became a vector of change while giving rise to internal rivalries.

UirtusVol. 2(5)
University of Kara (TG)
Openalex Percentile: Top 81%
Agriculture and Rural Development Research
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.