Comparing bike and e-scooter sharing spatiotemporal patterns: implications of resolution choices

Abstract Understanding the similarities and disparities between users and usage patterns of bike and e-scooter sharing could enrich our understanding of the level of competition and complementarity between them. Literature review reveals that knowledge on the level of similarity is still scarce, especially across multiple temporal resolutions. The present study aimed to extend the existing literature on the usage patterns of bike and e-scooter sharing, specify the level of similarity and identify its variance in different time resolutions. To this end, the study exploited 12-month shared bike and e-scooter trip records from Munich, Germany. The analysis included descriptive and statistical comparisons of spatiotemporal trip patterns, as well as a comparison of spatiotemporal demand fluctuation clusters. Overall, the findings showed that usage patterns have multiple commonalities, such as an increased trip generation rate during warmer months and a pronounced evening peak. Yet, e-scooter trips are more concentrated around mobility hubs. More diverging trip generation characteristics were found. Specifically, the results of the spatiotemporal cluster analysis showed a higher variety in the trip generation profiles of shared e-scooters compared to bikes across the operation area. Overall, the study demonstrates the critical role of resolution choice in the obtained results and highlights that policymakers and transport planners should consider using multiple resolutions in their analysis of the trip generation of shared micromobility.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Transportation
Published
2025-09-09
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11116-025-10665-y
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Urban Transport and Accessibility
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
2.18

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Comparing bike and e-scooter sharing spatiotemporal patterns: implications of resolution choices

Yusak Octavius Susilo, Roxani Gkavra
1 citations
Transportation
Urban Transport and Accessibility
2.18
article

Comparing bike and e-scooter sharing spatiotemporal patterns: implications of resolution choices

Yusak Octavius Susilo, Roxani Gkavra
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Abstract Understanding the similarities and disparities between users and usage patterns of bike and e-scooter sharing could enrich our understanding of the level of competition and complementarity between them. Literature review reveals that knowledge on the level of similarity is still scarce, especially across multiple temporal resolutions. The present study aimed to extend the existing literature on the usage patterns of bike and e-scooter sharing, specify the level of similarity and identify its variance in different time resolutions. To this end, the study exploited 12-month shared bike and e-scooter trip records from Munich, Germany. The analysis included descriptive and statistical comparisons of spatiotemporal trip patterns, as well as a comparison of spatiotemporal demand fluctuation clusters. Overall, the findings showed that usage patterns have multiple commonalities, such as an increased trip generation rate during warmer months and a pronounced evening peak. Yet, e-scooter trips are more concentrated around mobility hubs. More diverging trip generation characteristics were found. Specifically, the results of the spatiotemporal cluster analysis showed a higher variety in the trip generation profiles of shared e-scooters compared to bikes across the operation area. Overall, the study demonstrates the critical role of resolution choice in the obtained results and highlights that policymakers and transport planners should consider using multiple resolutions in their analysis of the trip generation of shared micromobility.

Transportation
BOKU University (AT)
National University of Singapore
Openalex Percentile: Top 11%
Urban Transport and Accessibility
2.18
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.