Manufacturing Legitimacy: Media Ownership and the Framing of the July 2024 Uprising in Bangladesh

Bangladesh witnessed its biggest nationwide mass uprising since gaining independence in 1971, which led to the overthrow of an authoritarian government that had existed for a decade. This study employed the protest paradigm to analyze how the protests were framed by mainstream print media and how media ownership influenced their coverage. Drawing on a quantitative content analysis of five major newspapers from different ownerships, the study explores dominant media frames, tone, and legitimacy of protest coverage. The findings indicate that media ownership significantly affects the credibility and tone of the protest coverage. The protest paradigm was applied more strictly by pro-government media outlets. Independent and anti-government outlets, on the other hand, took a more impartial stance. The study reveals how media ownership shaped the framing of dissent, reinforcing the protest paradigm in ways that aligned with the ruling party’s interests. This study adds to the body of knowledge on South Asian media bias and authoritarian information control.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journalism and Media
Published
2025-09-09
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/journalmedia6030148
Citations
3
Primary Topic
Media Influence and Politics
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
12.60
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Manufacturing Legitimacy: Media Ownership and the Framing of the July 2024 Uprising in Bangladesh

Zahedur Rahman Arman, Tariquil Islam, Md. Mahbbat Ali, Jamal Uddin et al.
3 citations
Journalism and Media
Media Influence and Politics
12.60
article

Manufacturing Legitimacy: Media Ownership and the Framing of the July 2024 Uprising in Bangladesh

Zahedur Rahman Arman, Tariquil Islam, Md. Mahbbat Ali, Jamal Uddin, Didarul Islam Manik, Umar Hyder
article en
3 citations

Abstract

Bangladesh witnessed its biggest nationwide mass uprising since gaining independence in 1971, which led to the overthrow of an authoritarian government that had existed for a decade. This study employed the protest paradigm to analyze how the protests were framed by mainstream print media and how media ownership influenced their coverage. Drawing on a quantitative content analysis of five major newspapers from different ownerships, the study explores dominant media frames, tone, and legitimacy of protest coverage. The findings indicate that media ownership significantly affects the credibility and tone of the protest coverage. The protest paradigm was applied more strictly by pro-government media outlets. Independent and anti-government outlets, on the other hand, took a more impartial stance. The study reveals how media ownership shaped the framing of dissent, reinforcing the protest paradigm in ways that aligned with the ruling party’s interests. This study adds to the body of knowledge on South Asian media bias and authoritarian information control.

Journalism and MediaVol. 6(3)
Cornell University (US), Independent University, Bangladesh (BD), Central New Mexico Community College (US), Bellbrook Labs (United States) (US), World University of Bangladesh (BD), Mississippi State University (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 2%
Media Influence and Politics
12.60
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Manufacturing Legitimacy: Media Ownership and the Framing of the July 2024 Uprising in Bangladesh — Zahedur Rahman Arman, Tariquil Islam, et al. · Journalism and Media (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS