Assessment of observer variation in identifying craniometric landmarks and calculating radiographic anatomic indices of the temporomandibular joint: a cross-sectional study

BACKGROUND: One of the key tasks of contemporary dentistry is the analysis of radiographic images of the temporomandibular joint. Errors arising during analysis of cone-beam computed tomography data of the temporomandibular joint may lead to incorrect radiologic interpretation and inadequate treatment planning. AIM: This work aimed to determine the extent to which observer variation influences the radiologic interpretation of temporomandibular joint status based on cone-beam computed tomography data. METHODS: Сone-beam computed tomography scans of the facial bones were obtained from 20 patients (14 women, 6 men; age range, 25–64 years) with temporomandibular joint disorders. To assess the impact of observer variation on the analysis of cone-beam computed tomography images of the temporomandibular joint, unified software and a standardized protocol for identifying craniometric landmarks were used to calculate the anatomic and topographic position of the mandibular condyle. Cone-beam computed tomography analysis was performed using our method of automated craniometry of cranial anatomical structures (Certificate of State Registration of Computer Programs No. 2017662860). The obtained data were used to analyze deviations in calculations. RESULTS: The study revealed substantial systematic and random errors in the assessment of the analyzed craniometric parameters, which are unacceptable in clinical practice. CONCLUSION: To reduce the impact of observer variation on radiologic interpretation in cone-beam computed tomography analysis of the facial bones, training programs should include not only theoretical instructions but also substantial time for workplace internship under the supervision of an experienced mentor.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Russian Journal of Dentistry
Published
2025-09-09
DOI
https://doi.org/10.17816/dent689252
Primary Topic
Dental Radiography and Imaging
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Assessment of observer variation in identifying craniometric landmarks and calculating radiographic anatomic indices of the temporomandibular joint: a cross-sectional study

Марина Самуткина, Gennadii N. Belanov, Marina V. Komarova, Oleg V. Slesarev et al.
Russian Journal of Dentistry
Dental Radiography and Imaging
article

Assessment of observer variation in identifying craniometric landmarks and calculating radiographic anatomic indices of the temporomandibular joint: a cross-sectional study

Марина Самуткина, Gennadii N. Belanov, Marina V. Komarova, Oleg V. Slesarev, И. М. Байриков, Karina T. Sargsyan, Natalia Poliarush, Alexander Samykin, Yulia Aleshkova
article en

Abstract

BACKGROUND: One of the key tasks of contemporary dentistry is the analysis of radiographic images of the temporomandibular joint. Errors arising during analysis of cone-beam computed tomography data of the temporomandibular joint may lead to incorrect radiologic interpretation and inadequate treatment planning. AIM: This work aimed to determine the extent to which observer variation influences the radiologic interpretation of temporomandibular joint status based on cone-beam computed tomography data. METHODS: Сone-beam computed tomography scans of the facial bones were obtained from 20 patients (14 women, 6 men; age range, 25–64 years) with temporomandibular joint disorders. To assess the impact of observer variation on the analysis of cone-beam computed tomography images of the temporomandibular joint, unified software and a standardized protocol for identifying craniometric landmarks were used to calculate the anatomic and topographic position of the mandibular condyle. Cone-beam computed tomography analysis was performed using our method of automated craniometry of cranial anatomical structures (Certificate of State Registration of Computer Programs No. 2017662860). The obtained data were used to analyze deviations in calculations. RESULTS: The study revealed substantial systematic and random errors in the assessment of the analyzed craniometric parameters, which are unacceptable in clinical practice. CONCLUSION: To reduce the impact of observer variation on radiologic interpretation in cone-beam computed tomography analysis of the facial bones, training programs should include not only theoretical instructions but also substantial time for workplace internship under the supervision of an experienced mentor.

Russian Journal of DentistryVol. 29(5)
Samara National Research University (RU), Samara Medical Institute Reaviz (RU), Espoo Music Institute (FI), Institute of Electronic Measurements KVARZ (Russia) (RU), École Supérieure de Psychologie (MA), Escuela Politécnica Javeriana del Ecuador (EC), Samara State Medical University (RU)
Openalex Percentile: Top 66%
Dental Radiography and Imaging
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.