How do pre-service teachers integrate knowledge when reflecting on a pedagogical situation? An analysis of concept maps in teacher education

The use of professional knowledge (from different areas; content knowledge, pedagogical knowledge, pedagogical-psychological knowledge)—that is, scientific evidence in the broader sense—can help teachers to act professionally in complex pedagogical situations. An important part of the professional use of evidence is the integration of various components of knowledge. Existing research evaluates knowledge integration dichotomously or refers to multiple document research, although we assume that the structures are more complex and should be taken into account when promoting knowledge integration of prospective teachers. Concept maps—that represent mental structures—enable a detailed assessment of structures of integrated knowledge. The aim of this study is to work out differentiated structures of knowledge integration. In a field setting, 33 master’s students (primary science education) designed concept maps to analyze a given pedagogical situation. The maps were coded structurally and thematically. Additionally, graph theoretical measures were applied. Results show three types of knowledge integration that we call Interrelation , Side-by-Side Integration and Merging . We discuss these types in terms of theoretical implications and possible benefits for teacher education. A differentiated analysis of structures of knowledge integration can be used to create individualized learning opportunities.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Frontiers in Education
Published
2025-09-09
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2025.1657597
Primary Topic
Educational Strategies and Epistemologies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

How do pre-service teachers integrate knowledge when reflecting on a pedagogical situation? An analysis of concept maps in teacher education

Ulrike Hartmann, Judith Schellenbach‐Zell, Anna‐Lena Molitor
Frontiers in Education
Educational Strategies and Epistemologies
article

How do pre-service teachers integrate knowledge when reflecting on a pedagogical situation? An analysis of concept maps in teacher education

Ulrike Hartmann, Judith Schellenbach‐Zell, Anna‐Lena Molitor
article en

Abstract

The use of professional knowledge (from different areas; content knowledge, pedagogical knowledge, pedagogical-psychological knowledge)—that is, scientific evidence in the broader sense—can help teachers to act professionally in complex pedagogical situations. An important part of the professional use of evidence is the integration of various components of knowledge. Existing research evaluates knowledge integration dichotomously or refers to multiple document research, although we assume that the structures are more complex and should be taken into account when promoting knowledge integration of prospective teachers. Concept maps—that represent mental structures—enable a detailed assessment of structures of integrated knowledge. The aim of this study is to work out differentiated structures of knowledge integration. In a field setting, 33 master’s students (primary science education) designed concept maps to analyze a given pedagogical situation. The maps were coded structurally and thematically. Additionally, graph theoretical measures were applied. Results show three types of knowledge integration that we call Interrelation , Side-by-Side Integration and Merging . We discuss these types in terms of theoretical implications and possible benefits for teacher education. A differentiated analysis of structures of knowledge integration can be used to create individualized learning opportunities.

Frontiers in EducationVol. 10
University of Wuppertal (DE), DIPF | Leibniz Institute for Research and Information in Education (DE)
Australian Government, Bundesministerium für Bildung und Forschung
Openalex Percentile: Top 73%
Educational Strategies and Epistemologies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.