Crossing Borders of Choice: Navigating the Divergence of Abortion between the United States and Canada

This essay delves into the divergence in abortion policies in the United States and Canada by analyzing the interplay of the rise of right-wing political ideologies, the role of the media, and the level of decentralization in shaping political and societal perspectives. In the United States, the resurgence of conservative politics, amplified by media polarization, has led to a decentralized approach, with states regaining control over abortion regulations after the overturning of Roe v. Wade. Contrastingly, Canada has maintained a more centralized position, bolstering reproductive rights and accessibility to abortion services. While media narratives and political ideologies play significant roles in both nations, the key factor driving this divergence is the level of decentralization in the two countries. This paper explores the pivotal role of decentralization in shaping the disparate trajectories of abortion policies between the United States and Canada.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
The Social Contract
Published
2025-09-09
DOI
https://doi.org/10.5206/sc.v16i1.22582
Primary Topic
Reproductive Health and Contraception
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Crossing Borders of Choice: Navigating the Divergence of Abortion between the United States and Canada

Isabella Perkovic
1 links
The Social Contract
Reproductive Health and Contraception
article

Crossing Borders of Choice: Navigating the Divergence of Abortion between the United States and Canada

Isabella Perkovic
article en

Abstract

This essay delves into the divergence in abortion policies in the United States and Canada by analyzing the interplay of the rise of right-wing political ideologies, the role of the media, and the level of decentralization in shaping political and societal perspectives. In the United States, the resurgence of conservative politics, amplified by media polarization, has led to a decentralized approach, with states regaining control over abortion regulations after the overturning of Roe v. Wade. Contrastingly, Canada has maintained a more centralized position, bolstering reproductive rights and accessibility to abortion services. While media narratives and political ideologies play significant roles in both nations, the key factor driving this divergence is the level of decentralization in the two countries. This paper explores the pivotal role of decentralization in shaping the disparate trajectories of abortion policies between the United States and Canada.

The Social ContractVol. 16(1)
Openalex Percentile: Top 67%
Reproductive Health and Contraception
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.