Is the US War on Terror a Failure?

This essay questions whether the American War on Terror was justifiable. It begins by arguing that the initiation of the war on Iraq was immoral due to the illegitimate use of force that unnecessarily generated substantial mass casualties. This use of force was also granted based on an uncertain assumption drawn by the Bush administration that Iraq had violated its United Nations (UN) agreement, which is a highly devastating claim to make for the consequential purpose of waging a war. Unlawful torturous techniques were also employed in black sites, which are clandestine jails used to hold prisoners who are not charged with a crime for the purpose of interrogation. However, these black sites were held in order to perform extraordinary rendition on alleged Al-Qaeda members, attempting to extract information about terrorist groups’ plans under the discriminate assumption that these prisoners were in fact associated to these groups based upon their religious identity. The final part of the essay offers a critical dissection of the validity of the Patriot Act, which disregarded numerous civil liberties as well as the U.S. Constitution.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
The Social Contract
Published
2025-09-09
DOI
https://doi.org/10.5206/sc.v14i1.23001
Primary Topic
Torture, Ethics, and Law
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Is the US War on Terror a Failure?

Diana El-Baraqouni
The Social Contract
Torture, Ethics, and Law
article

Is the US War on Terror a Failure?

Diana El-Baraqouni
article en

Abstract

This essay questions whether the American War on Terror was justifiable. It begins by arguing that the initiation of the war on Iraq was immoral due to the illegitimate use of force that unnecessarily generated substantial mass casualties. This use of force was also granted based on an uncertain assumption drawn by the Bush administration that Iraq had violated its United Nations (UN) agreement, which is a highly devastating claim to make for the consequential purpose of waging a war. Unlawful torturous techniques were also employed in black sites, which are clandestine jails used to hold prisoners who are not charged with a crime for the purpose of interrogation. However, these black sites were held in order to perform extraordinary rendition on alleged Al-Qaeda members, attempting to extract information about terrorist groups’ plans under the discriminate assumption that these prisoners were in fact associated to these groups based upon their religious identity. The final part of the essay offers a critical dissection of the validity of the Patriot Act, which disregarded numerous civil liberties as well as the U.S. Constitution.

The Social ContractVol. 14(1)
Openalex Percentile: Top 67%
Torture, Ethics, and Law
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.