Trudeau's Refusal to Take a Stance on the Israel-Palestinian Conflict

Having gained immense traction in worldwide media throughout the last decade, the Israel-Palestine conflict has been cause for immense partisanship, with many world leaders being forced to take a stance on the issue - either publicly or with their voting decisions at the United Nations. This paper investigates the conflict itself and contextualizes Canada’s foreign policy towards Israel while under Jean Chrétien, Paul Martin, and eventually Stephen Harper. Following this, it discusses the current Liberal Party’s stance on the conflict, comparing it to perspectives of their opposition. Further, it directly compares the party’s policies to Justin Trudeau’s statements and actions, and in doing so demonstrates the glaring discrepancies between the two. Using these analyses, the paper provides a critique of Trudeau’s lack of direct action despite his clear desire to present himself as a bipartisan leader of peace on the world stage, with this contradiction only working to excuse Israel’s countless human rights violations.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
The Social Contract
Published
2025-09-09
DOI
https://doi.org/10.5206/sc.v14i1.23002
Primary Topic
Canadian Policy and Governance
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Trudeau's Refusal to Take a Stance on the Israel-Palestinian Conflict

Michelle Wodchis-Johnson
The Social Contract
Canadian Policy and Governance
article

Trudeau's Refusal to Take a Stance on the Israel-Palestinian Conflict

Michelle Wodchis-Johnson
article en

Abstract

Having gained immense traction in worldwide media throughout the last decade, the Israel-Palestine conflict has been cause for immense partisanship, with many world leaders being forced to take a stance on the issue - either publicly or with their voting decisions at the United Nations. This paper investigates the conflict itself and contextualizes Canada’s foreign policy towards Israel while under Jean Chrétien, Paul Martin, and eventually Stephen Harper. Following this, it discusses the current Liberal Party’s stance on the conflict, comparing it to perspectives of their opposition. Further, it directly compares the party’s policies to Justin Trudeau’s statements and actions, and in doing so demonstrates the glaring discrepancies between the two. Using these analyses, the paper provides a critique of Trudeau’s lack of direct action despite his clear desire to present himself as a bipartisan leader of peace on the world stage, with this contradiction only working to excuse Israel’s countless human rights violations.

The Social ContractVol. 14(1)
Openalex Percentile: Top 71%
Canadian Policy and Governance
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.